Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hyman Fine Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hyman Fine Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Attleboro (00160000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hyman Fine Elementary School (00160040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.1 84.8 80.5 81.9 1.4 91.1 92.4 3318250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.6, Target = 85CPI = 73.6, Target = 85CPI = 73.6, Target = 85 74.2 67.6 73.6 6.0 85.0 87.1 398950Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.6, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.6, Target = 72.9CPI = 74.6, Target = 72.9 70.4 70.4 74.6 4.2 72.9 85.2 3956100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 73.8, Target = 82CPI = 73.8, Target = 82CPI = 73.8, Target = 82 78.4 69.8 73.8 4.0 82.0 89.2 634250Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 62, Target = 72.3CPI = 62, Target = 72.3CPI = 62, Target = 72.3 52.5 52.9 62.0 9.1 72.3 76.3 432550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino  82.5---- 91.3-30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 92.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 92.7 87.4 82.9 87.3 4.4 92.7 93.7 4611250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.2, Target = 92.8CPI = 83.2, Target = 92.8 87.6 81.6 83.2 1.6 92.8 93.8 4018350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 87.6CPI = 71.9, Target = 87.6 78.8 68.8 71.9 3.1 87.6 89.4 329050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.8, Target = 71.1CPI = 72.8, Target = 71.1CPI = 72.8, Target = 71.1 68.5 68.5 72.8 4.3 71.1 84.3 3557100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 70.8, Target = 88.1CPI = 70.8, Target = 88.1CPI = 70.8, Target = 88.1 85.7 69.0 70.8 1.8 88.1 92.9 414250Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61, Target = 76.7CPI = 61, Target = 76.7CPI = 61, Target = 76.7 60.0 59.6 61.0 1.4 76.7 80.0 392550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino  83.8---- 91.9-30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 93.6CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.6CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.6 89.1 85.0 90.3 5.3 93.6 94.6 6411350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.9 8.21820 7.3 7.71820
High needs 2.5 1.1890 13.6 12.4890
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.7 0.0560 11.1 12.5560
EL and Former EL 0.0 0.0420 13.8 11.94225
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.02525 20.6 24.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--30---30-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.8 11.61120 6.7 4.511225
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.0 32.818325 10.2 10.41830
High needs 11.1 17.89025 22.2 20.0900
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.1 21.15725 22.2 19.35725
EL and Former EL 6.9 16.74225 20.7 23.8420
Students w/ disabilities 5.9 4.0250 32.4 32.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--30---30-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--10---10-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.5 42.511325 6.7 3.511325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 48.5 67.0 18.5 51.0No92100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 37.5 63.0 25.5 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-27--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 49.0 62.0 13.0 51.0Yes59100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 51.5 66.0 14.5 51.0Yes93100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 46.5 63.5 17.0 51.0Yes46100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-28--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51SGP = 72, Target = 51 52.0 72.0 20.0 51.0Yes60100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 78.5 60.06025
High needs 78.5 60.06025
EL and Former EL 78.5 60.06025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students18718699Yes188188100Yes----
High needs949399Yes9494100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged616098Yes6161100Yes----
EL and Former EL4444100Yes4444100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian19---19-------
Afr. Amer./Black12---13-------
Hispanic/Latino3030100Yes3030100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11511499Yes115115100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles