Massachusetts School and District Profiles

M Norcross Stratton
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - M Norcross Stratton
Organization Information
District:Arlington (00100000)School type:Elementary School
School:M Norcross Stratton (00100055)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.6, Target = 96.2CPI = 94.6, Target = 96.2CPI = 94.6, Target = 96.2 93.5 92.9 94.6 1.7 96.2 96.8 92186100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 86.2, Target = 87.6CPI = 86.2, Target = 87.6 78.7 82.5 86.2 3.7 87.6 89.4 904975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 82.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 82.7, Target = 86.9CPI = 82.7, Target = 86.9 77.5 78.1 82.7 4.6 86.9 88.8 932675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 91.1, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.1, Target = 92.9CPI = 91.1, Target = 92.9 92.2 92.2 91.1 -1.1 92.9 96.1 392825No Change
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 97CPI = 95.7, Target = 97CPI = 95.7, Target = 97 94.8 93.6 95.7 2.1 97.0 97.4 94133100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 95.4CPI = 90.2, Target = 95.4CPI = 90.2, Target = 95.4 92.1 90.0 90.2 0.2 95.4 96.1 7218450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 88.4CPI = 79.1, Target = 88.4CPI = 79.1, Target = 88.4 80.1 80.3 79.1 -1.2 88.4 90.1 644925No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 72.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 72.1, Target = 87.6 78.8 72.6 72.1 -0.5 87.6 89.4 702625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 95.5, Target = 93.7CPI = 95.5, Target = 93.7CPI = 95.5, Target = 93.7 93.1 93.1 95.5 2.4 93.7 96.6 4528100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.3CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.3 93.6 90.8 90.3 -0.5 96.3 96.8 6413125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 95.2CPI = 88.4, Target = 95.2CPI = 88.4, Target = 95.2 91.7 90.3 88.4 -1.9 95.2 95.9 775825No Change
High needs -------16--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 89.1, Target = 95.7 92.7 91.7 89.1 -2.6 95.7 96.4 713975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.4 21.01860 1.5 0.518625
High needs 7.5 6.1490 5.7 0.04925
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 3.82625 9.4 0.02625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 13.8 17.92825 3.4 0.02825
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 20.31330 1.5 0.813325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.0 40.21840 3.1 4.31840
High needs 11.5 12.2490 9.6 8.24925
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 11.52625 12.9 11.52625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 48.3 42.9280 0.0 0.02825
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.2 42.71310 2.2 5.31310
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.3 27.6580 1.5 1.7580
High needs--16---16-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.6 28.2390 2.1 0.03925
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51 58.0 62.5 4.5 51.0Yes116100Above Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 56.0 45.0 -11.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 58.0 61.0 3.0 51.0Yes83100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 50.0 49.0 -1.0 51.0Yes11575On Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 46.0 33.5 -12.5 51.0No3225Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 50.0 41.0 -9.0 51.0Yes8175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19218998Yes19118798Yes5959100Yes
High needs535196Yes535196Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged15---15---5---
EL and Former EL16---16---2---
Students w/ disabilities282697Yes282697Yes9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2929100Yes2929100Yes10---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---3---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13713599Yes13613398Yes3939100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles