Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Peirce
District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Peirce
Organization Information
District:Arlington (00100000)School type:Elementary School
School:Peirce (00100045)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 94.3 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.3, Target = 94.375 or Higher All Students 90.2 89.3 94.3 5.0 94.3 95.1 91127100Above Target
High needsCPI = 86.3, Target = 87.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 86.3, Target = 87.9 75 or Higher High needs 79.3 71.5 86.3 14.8 87.9 89.7 914275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 94.6 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.2, Target = 94.675 or Higher White 90.7 93.1 95.2 2.1 94.6 95.4 9289100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.3, Target = 92.2 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 93.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 93.3, Target = 92.275 or Higher All Students 86.7 90.0 93.3 3.3 92.2 93.4 8612775On Target
High needsCPI = 86, Target = 86.9 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 86, Target = 86.975 or Higher High needs 77.6 73.3 86.0 12.7 86.9 88.8 894175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.9, Target = 92.8 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 96.9, Target = 92.875 or Higher White 87.6 95.3 96.9 1.6 92.8 93.8 9788100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.5, Target = 96.2 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 89.5, Target = 96.2 75 or Higher All Students 93.4 92.1 89.5 -2.6 96.2 96.7 813875On Target
High needs -------14--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96, Target = 95.6 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 96, Target = 95.675 or Higher White 92.5 94.8 96.0 1.2 95.6 96.3 9625100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.5 33.11270 6.3 2.412725
High needs 16.3 9.5420 18.6 4.84225
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.8 38.2890 4.6 2.28925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.6 52.012725 5.6 0.812725
High needs 18.6 22.04125 16.3 2.44125
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 57.0 60.2880 2.3 0.08825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 48.8 42.1380 7.3 2.63825
High needs--14---14-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 58.6 52.0250 3.4 0.02525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 63.0 59.0 -4.0 51.0Yes8175On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 58.5 55.0 -3.5 51.0Yes2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 61, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 5175 or Higher White 65.5 61.0 -4.5 51.0Yes57100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 69.0 57.0 -12.0 51.0Yes8075On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 66.0 57.0 -9.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-13--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 71.5 57.0 -14.5 51.0Yes5575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.012.00-
High needs- 60.012.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.012.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students13313198Yes13313198Yes4141100Yes
High needs4545100Yes454498Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---8---
EL and Former EL19---19---9---
Students w/ disabilities23---23---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian12---12---3---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---6---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White929199Yes929098Yes2727100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles