Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Henry C Sanborn Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Henry C Sanborn Elementary
Organization Information
District:Andover (00090000)School type:Elementary School
School:Henry C Sanborn Elementary (00090010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.9, Target = 96.8CPI = 90.9, Target = 96.8CPI = 90.9, Target = 96.8 94.5 91.7 90.9 -0.8 96.8 97.3 7420625No Change
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 91.2CPI = 75, Target = 91.2CPI = 75, Target = 91.2 84.9 74.5 75.0 0.5 91.2 92.5 455950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.5, Target = 91CPI = 65.5, Target = 91CPI = 65.5, Target = 91 84.5 61.8 65.5 3.7 91.0 92.3 543750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.9 94.6 96.6 95.2 -1.4 96.9 97.3 6163100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 97.3CPI = 89.1, Target = 97.3CPI = 89.1, Target = 97.3 95.3 89.1 89.1 0.0 97.3 97.7 5612225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 97.9CPI = 91.9, Target = 97.9CPI = 91.9, Target = 97.9 96.4 92.3 91.9 -0.4 97.9 98.2 7920725No Change
High needsCPI = 80, Target = 95CPI = 80, Target = 95CPI = 80, Target = 95 91.4 77.8 80.0 2.2 95.0 95.7 686050Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.7, Target = 94CPI = 71.7, Target = 94CPI = 71.7, Target = 94 89.7 69.1 71.7 2.6 94.0 94.9 693850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 96.4, Target = 98.1CPI = 96.4, Target = 98.1CPI = 96.4, Target = 98.1 96.7 98.0 96.4 -1.6 98.1 98.4 5363100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.8, Target = 98CPI = 89.8, Target = 98CPI = 89.8, Target = 98 96.5 90.1 89.8 -0.3 98.0 98.3 6112225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 96CPI = 87.3, Target = 96CPI = 87.3, Target = 96 93.1 90.5 87.3 -3.2 96.0 96.6 72730Declined
High needs -------21--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------23--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 95.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 95.6CPI = 87.2, Target = 95.6 92.4 91.1 87.2 -3.9 95.6 96.2 61450Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 38.3 29.12060 4.6 4.92060
High needs 20.8 13.6590 17.0 16.9590
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 11.8 8.1370 26.5 24.3370
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 52.9 38.1630 0.0 1.6630
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.5 25.41220 6.5 6.61220
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 54.6 51.72070 4.1 3.92070
High needs 35.8 30.0600 15.1 10.06025
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 23.5 10.5380 23.5 13.23825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 76.5 82.5630 0.0 0.06325
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.0 37.71220 5.6 5.71220
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.2 30.1730 1.6 4.1730
High needs--21---21-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--23---23-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.4 20.0450 2.2 0.04525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 57.0 45.0 -12.0 51.0No13150Below Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 29.0 46.0 17.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 76.0 47.5 -28.5 51.0No4050Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 55.0 43.0 -12.0 51.0No7650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 67.0 52.0 -15.0 51.0No13175On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 65.0 59.0 -6.0 51.0No3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-8--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-6--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-2--
AsianSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 83.5 66.5 -17.0 51.0No40100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 59.0 42.5 -16.5 51.0No7650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.013-
High needs- 60.013-
EL and Former EL- 60.013-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students22121497Yes22121597Yes7575100Yes
High needs726692No726793No2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---6---
EL and Former EL21---21---7---
Students w/ disabilities433888No433991No15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2-------
Asian6666100Yes6666100Yes24---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino12---12---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White13212695Yes13212695Yes4646100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles