Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bancroft Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bancroft Elementary
Organization Information
District:Andover (00090000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bancroft Elementary (00090003)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.9 93.0 89.0 91.7 2.7 95.9 96.5 7733650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.4, Target = 91.4CPI = 74.4, Target = 91.4CPI = 74.4, Target = 91.4 85.2 61.8 74.4 12.6 91.4 92.6 428350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 71.6, Target = 91.3 85.0 57.0 71.6 14.6 91.3 92.5 686750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 96.6, Target = 95.4CPI = 96.6, Target = 95.4CPI = 96.6, Target = 95.4 93.8 96.0 96.6 0.6 95.4 96.9 7829100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.7, Target = 95.9 93.0 89.8 93.7 3.9 95.9 96.5 8327075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.4, Target = 95.7CPI = 88.4, Target = 95.7CPI = 88.4, Target = 95.7 92.6 87.2 88.4 1.2 95.7 96.3 6433650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.1, Target = 90CPI = 65.1, Target = 90CPI = 65.1, Target = 90 82.8 56.4 65.1 8.7 90.0 91.4 138350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.4, Target = 89.8CPI = 60.4, Target = 89.8CPI = 60.4, Target = 89.8 82.5 53.5 60.4 6.9 89.8 91.3 376750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
AsianCPI = 96.6, Target = 96.3CPI = 96.6, Target = 96.3 95.0 97.0 96.6 -0.4 96.3 97.5 5529100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 96CPI = 89.7, Target = 96CPI = 89.7, Target = 96 93.1 88.5 89.7 1.2 96.0 96.6 6127050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.2, Target = 96CPI = 85.2, Target = 96CPI = 85.2, Target = 96 93.1 88.4 85.2 -3.2 96.0 96.6 651250Declined
High needs  90.9---- 95.5-23--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  91.3---- 95.7-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 84.5, Target = 96.4CPI = 84.5, Target = 96.4 93.8 88.4 84.5 -3.9 96.4 96.9 481030Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.0 22.933625 5.3 3.333625
High needs 0.0 4.88325 23.5 12.08325
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.06725 27.9 13.46725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 32.0 51.72925 0.0 3.4290
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.2 21.927025 4.0 1.127025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.2 43.233625 6.9 6.033625
High needs 9.8 15.78325 31.4 22.98325
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 10.46725 34.9 26.96725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian 72.0 75.9290 0.0 0.02925
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--17---17-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 34.8 42.227025 4.5 4.42700
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.7 31.21250 4.3 4.81250
High needs--23---23-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.7 30.11030 3.6 5.81030
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 49.5 58.0 8.5 51.0Yes22775On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 33.0 52.0 19.0 51.0Yes51100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 31.5 52.0 20.5 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-21--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 49.0 59.0 10.0 51.0Yes18575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 50.0 48.0 -2.0 51.0No22650Below Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 29.0 37.0 8.0 51.0Yes5175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 27.0 37.0 10.0 51.0No4575On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-21--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 49.0 45.5 -3.5 51.0No18450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.014-
High needs- 60.014-
EL and Former EL- 60.014-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students341341100Yes341341100Yes12612599Yes
High needs8686100Yes8686100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged22---22---4---
EL and Former EL11---11---1---
Students w/ disabilities7070100Yes7070100Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---1---
Asian2929100Yes2929100Yes15---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino17---17---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.13---13---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White273273100Yes273273100Yes10410399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles