Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Beaver Brook Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2016 Accountability Data - Beaver Brook Elementary School
Organization Information
District:Abington (00010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Beaver Brook Elementary School (00010003)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 83.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 83.5, Target = 88.2 79.8 82.3 83.5 1.2 88.2 89.9 4031150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.3, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.3, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.3, Target = 81.3 67.9 69.8 72.3 2.5 81.3 84.0 3310250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78, Target = 75.7CPI = 78, Target = 75.7CPI = 78, Target = 75.7 73.5 73.5 78.0 4.5 75.7 86.8 5566100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.4, Target = 70.2CPI = 61.4, Target = 70.2CPI = 61.4, Target = 70.2 48.9 47.7 61.4 13.7 70.2 74.5 414650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3 79.9 82.1 83.6 1.5 88.3 90.0 2529250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83, Target = 86.2CPI = 83, Target = 86.2CPI = 83, Target = 86.2 76.3 77.9 83.0 5.1 86.2 88.2 3931050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.3, Target = 78.4CPI = 72.3, Target = 78.4 62.9 66.6 72.3 5.7 78.4 81.5 3310250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.9, Target = 71.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 71.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 71.7 69.1 69.1 79.9 10.8 71.7 84.6 6666100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------14--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 59.8, Target = 67CPI = 59.8, Target = 67CPI = 59.8, Target = 67 43.5 50.0 59.8 9.8 67.0 71.8 354650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 86.4CPI = 83.1, Target = 86.4CPI = 83.1, Target = 86.4 76.7 77.9 83.1 5.2 86.4 88.4 2529150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.0 7.73110 6.8 7.13110
High needs 4.1 2.91020 16.5 16.71020
Econ. Disadvantaged 6.0 4.5660 10.7 9.16625
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0460 41.9 26.14625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.4 8.22920 7.1 7.22920
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.3 24.231025 12.9 7.431025
High needs 4.9 10.810225 23.8 18.610225
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.9 16.76625 18.8 12.16625
EL and Former EL--14---14-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 6.54625 46.5 30.44625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.9 24.129125 13.0 7.229125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 53.0 56.0 3.0 51.0No16775On Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 37.5 56.5 19.0 51.0No50100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 38.0 52.5 14.5 51.0No30100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-0--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 52.5 56.5 4.0 51.0No15875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 52.5 56.0 3.5 51.0Yes16675On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 35.0 55.0 20.0 51.0No50100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 38.5 54.0 15.5 51.0Yes31100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 53.0 56.0 3.0 51.0Yes15675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019-
High needs- 60.019-
EL and Former EL- 60.019-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students33132498Yes33132398Yes----
High needs11311198Yes11311198Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged777597Yes777597Yes----
EL and Former EL18---18-------
Students w/ disabilities474698Yes474698Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino13---13-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White30730098Yes30729997Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles