Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Dighton-Rehoboth (06500000)

TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School

SCHOOL
Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School (06500505)

GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12

REGION
Coastal

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Substantial progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
74% - Substantial progress toward targets	73

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	58%	84%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	74%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	12	12	47.5	12	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	7	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		8.5	10.7	-	9.2	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		79%		-	89%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		84%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	2	4	-
	Achievement total	8	12	47.5	7	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	6	8	22.5	3	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	5	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0	2	4	10.0
Weighted total		6.6	10.7	-	5.6	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		62%		-	54%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		58%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	49%	73%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	64%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	70.0
Growth	English language arts growth	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	-	-	-
	Growth total	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	0	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	4	4	-
	High school completion total	4	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		8.5	11.6	-
Percentage of possible points		73%		-
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		73%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-
	Achievement total	6	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	2	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	2	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	0	4	-
	High school completion total	4	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	4	8	10.0
Weighted total		5.2	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		49%		-
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		49%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.8	99.6	1.8	99.2	204	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	93.5	99.0	5.5	95.5	51	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	92.2	96.7	4.5	94.1	23	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.7	99.6	1.9	99.2	193	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	92.7	97.0	4.3	94.4	201	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	77.2	90.0	12.8	79.9	50	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	78.6	82.1	3.5	80.9	21	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	92.6	97.5	4.9	94.3	190	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	91.2	96.6	5.4	92.9	199	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	73.4	87.7	14.3	76.9	51	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	76.1	84.5	8.4	78.7	21	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	91.1	96.8	5.7	93.0	188	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.0	193	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	35.3	49	1	Low Growth
High needs	-	17	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	7	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	55.2	182	3	Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.1	193	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	43.0	49	2	Typical Growth - Low
High needs	-	17	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	13	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	7	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	55.0	182	3	Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	93.8	92.4	-1.4	95.6	211	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	85.9	73.3	-12.6	89.3	60	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	49	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	93.7	93.2	-0.5	95.5	190	1	No Change

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.2	96.9	-0.3	98.9	225	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	94.4	92.9	-1.5	98.3	85	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	70	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.0	97.1	-0.9	99.8	207	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	1.7	0.5	-1.2	1.5	826	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	6.3	1.7	-4.6	5.7	177	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	113	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	102	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.6	0.4	-1.2	1.4	759	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	14.5	16.8	2.3	13.2	819	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	17.4	9.8	-7.6	12.6	51	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	27.2	28.8	1.6	24.9	163	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	93	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	63	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.6	16.6	2.0	13.2	753	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	67.1	61.9	-5.2	71.5	383	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	40.2	36.4	-3.8	47.3	88	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	49	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	49	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	66.8	62.9	-3.9	71.8	350	0	Declined

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	210	210	100	Yes	1	210	207	99	Yes	1	211	211	100	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	24	24	24	22	25	25	73	71	97	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	15	15	15	14	16	16	46	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	13	13	13	11	14	14	40	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	2	2	2	3	3	7	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	4	4	4	4	4	4	12	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	5	5	5	5	5	15	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	199	199	199	196	199	199	597	594	99	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms