Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Henry P Clough

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Henry P Clough

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Mendon-Upton (07100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Henry P Clough (07100179)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
42% - Partially meeting targets62

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement------
Achievement total2867.54867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth14-04-
Growth total4822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total2.67.6-3.87.6-
Percentage of possible points 34%-50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total1867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism14-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total1410.0
Weighted total1.57.6-
Percentage of possible points 20%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage20%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 56

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 507.4 507.7 0.3 509.1 1452Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 488.9 495.1 6.2 492.8 214Exceeded Target
High needs 497.0 497.0 0.0 498.6 421No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 491.7 493.3 1.6 493.0 343Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 507.4 507.6 0.2 509.0 1332Improved Below Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 505.4 501.8 -3.6 506.6 1440Declined
Lowest Performing 484.9 476.9 -8.0 487.7 200Declined
High needs 494.8 492.7 -2.1 496.2 410Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 490.8 489.1 -1.7 492.6 330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 505.5 502.0 -3.5 506.8 1320Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.2 50.0 833Met Target
Lowest Performing 50.8 50.0 213Met Target
High needs 43.6 50.0 222Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 52.1 50.0 763Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.0 50.0 821Below Target
Lowest Performing 27.1 50.0 200Below Target
High needs 33.0 50.0 211Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 5--
EL and Former EL-- 2--
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 39.0 50.0 751Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 4.4 3.9 0.5 3.4 2833Met Target
Lowest Performing 19.0 14.3 4.7 15.8 214Exceeded Target
High needs 10.3 10.5 -0.2 8.3 761No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities 7.0 9.4 -2.4 4.3 530Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.8 3.4 0.4 2.7 2653Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 148 148100Yes 1 148 14799Yes 1 0----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 45 45100Yes 1 45 4498Yes 1 0----
Econ. Disadvantaged 13---- 13---- 0----
EL and Former EL 7---- 7---- 0----
Students w/ disabilities 35 35100Yes 1 35 3497Yes 1 0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black---------------
Hispanic/Latino 8---- 8---- 0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 136 136100Yes 1 136 13599Yes 1 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles