Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Stoneham High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Stoneham High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Stoneham (02840000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Stoneham High (02840505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
25% - Partially meeting targets47

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-04-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement04-04-
Achievement total41247.501267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-24-
Mathematics growth14-04-
Growth total5822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate14----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total71220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion04----
Additional indicators total4810.00410.0
Weighted total4.810.7-0.510.3-
Percentage of possible points 45%-5%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total11247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total3822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate24-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total61220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total2.810.7-
Percentage of possible points 26%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage26%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 33

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 97.9 -1.2 100.0 1704Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.6 92.7 -4.9 99.4 410Declined
High needs 95.8 93.6 -2.2 97.8 511No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.2 98.4 -0.8 100.0 1444Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.7 91.7 -3.0 96.4 1690Declined
Lowest Performing 80.8 71.9 -8.9 83.6 400Declined
High needs 82.9 79.0 -3.9 85.0 500Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.1 92.9 -2.2 96.7 1441No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 92.1 -3.1 96.9 1610Declined
Lowest Performing 82.1 72.5 -9.6 86.4 400Declined
High needs 84.4 80.1 -4.3 87.2 440Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 92.6 -2.7 97.1 1390Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 61.0 50.0 1614Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 42.6 50.0 372Below Target
High needs 49.8 50.0 432Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 22--
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities-- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 61.3 50.0 1394Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 39.7 50.0 1611Below Target
Lowest Performing 29.2 50.0 370Below Target
High needs 39.2 50.0 431Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 22--
EL and Former EL-- 8--
Students w/ disabilities-- 21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 5--
Hispanic/Latino-- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 38.5 50.0 1391Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.6 94.4 -0.2 96.9 1771No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 92.2 90.0 -2.2 96.3 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 43--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 0--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.5 94.4 -0.1 96.6 1611No Change

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 96.0 -1.0 98.7 1493Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.4 93.8 2.4 95.4 642Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 34--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 97.1 96.1 -1.0 98.9 1283Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.9 0.9 0.0 1.0 6793Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 3.5 2.4 1.1 3.2 1644Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 87--
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities---- 84--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 35--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.9 0.9 0.0 1.0 5863Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.9 18.1 1.8 18.8 6894Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 31.7 34.1 -2.4 25.1 410Declined
High needs 38.8 34.3 4.5 36.4 2014Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 98--
EL and Former EL---- 45--
Students w/ disabilities---- 98--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 31--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 20--
Hispanic/Latino---- 49--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 18.6 17.1 1.5 17.4 5683Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.5 73.8 -4.7 84.2 3240Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 50.0 42.9 -7.1 58.5 770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 40--
EL and Former EL---- 20--
Students w/ disabilities---- 38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.0 74.4 -5.6 85.3 2770Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 171 171100Yes 1 171 17099Yes 1 171 17099Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 51 51100Yes 1 51 5098Yes 1 51 5098Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 28 28100Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1 28 2796Yes 1
EL and Former EL 11---- 11---- 11----
Students w/ disabilities 25 25100Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 7---- 7---- 7----
Afr. Amer./Black 5---- 5---- 5----
Hispanic/Latino 11---- 11---- 11----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 144 144100Yes 1 144 144100Yes 1 144 144100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles