Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lynnfield High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lynnfield High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Lynnfield (01640000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Lynnfield High (01640505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
87% - Meeting targets98

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-34-
Science achievement44-34-
Achievement total121247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-34-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total7822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total7810.04410.0
Weighted total10.010.7-8.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 93%-81%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage87%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement14-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth44-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total3810.0
Weighted total7.510.7-
Percentage of possible points 70%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage70%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 97

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 100.0 0.6 100.0 1454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.3 100.0 1.7 99.7 354Exceeded Target
High needs 97.4 100.0 2.6 99.0 244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 100.0 0.5 100.0 1284Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 99.1 0.6 100.0 1454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.9 96.4 1.5 96.9 353Met Target
High needs 94.1 95.8 1.7 96.3 243Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.0 99.0 0.0 100.0 1284Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.0 98.4 0.4 99.4 1394Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.9 93.6 -0.3 96.0 353Met Target
High needs 92.6 90.6 -2.0 94.9 241No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 98.2 -0.4 100.0 1234Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.6 50.0 1414Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 51.9 50.0 343Met Target
High needs 66.0 50.0 244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 65.7 50.0 1254Exceeded Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 54.2 50.0 1413Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.1 50.0 342Below Target
High needs 49.0 50.0 242Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 7--
Hispanic/Latino-- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 55.0 50.0 1253Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 99.3 0.5 100.0 1524Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.8 97.7 1.9 99.0 433Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.3 99.3 0.0 100.0 1414Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 98.8 -1.2 100.0 1633Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 95.8 -4.2 100.0 483Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 29--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 99.3 -0.7 100.0 1504Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6283Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.7 0.0 0.7 1.0 1344Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 49--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 93--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 5663Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 1.3 2.6 -1.3 0.3 6454Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 4.4 0.0 4.4 0.0 354Exceeded Target
High needs 2.1 7.4 -5.3 0.0 1623Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 104--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 30--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.1 2.1 -1.0 0.0 5694Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.8 88.9 -1.9 94.0 3323Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.1 67.5 -9.6 85.1 770Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 35--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.3 90.4 -1.9 95.3 2933Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 145 145100Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1 24 24100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 11---- 11---- 11----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 14---- 14---- 14----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 5---- 5---- 5----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 7----
Hispanic/Latino 1---- 1---- 1----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 4----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 128 128100Yes 1 128 128100Yes 1 128 128100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles