Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Channing Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - William Ellery Channing

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
William Ellery Channing (00350360)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement04-44-
Science achievement------
Achievement total2860.06867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total5820.05822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.00410.0
Weighted total2.97.2-5.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 40%-68%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage54%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement---
Achievement total7867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total5822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total6.37.6-
Percentage of possible points 83%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage83%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 22

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.3 489.4 0.1 491.3 662Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 477.0 479.2 2.2 482.3 202Improved Below Target
High needs 485.6 488.2 2.6 487.6 484Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.6 488.2 2.6 487.2 454Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 15--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 487.3 485.6 -1.7 488.9 330Declined
Hispanic/Latino 492.8 494.1 1.3 494.5 253Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 2--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 485.2 483.7 -1.5 487.0 670Declined
Lowest Performing 468.7 476.4 7.7 472.0 214Exceeded Target
High needs 480.5 482.7 2.2 482.4 493Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 480.9 482.9 2.0 482.3 464Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 16--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 484.2 482.2 -2.0 486.0 330Declined
Hispanic/Latino 486.4 487.2 0.8 488.0 272Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 1--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students---- 19--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities---- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.3 50.0 382Below Target
Lowest Performing 41.2 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 44.8 50.0 292Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.4 50.0 272Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino-- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.9 50.0 403Met Target
Lowest Performing 59.2 50.0 213Met Target
High needs 58.9 50.0 313Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.8 50.0 293Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 19--
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-----

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.0 63.6 -11.4 45.3 333Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 33--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.9 15.3 3.6 17.0 1504Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 18.2 23.8 -5.6 13.5 210Declined
High needs 20.6 16.8 3.8 18.3 1134Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.2 18.9 5.3 21.8 904Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 42--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 0--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 12.5 11.0 1.5 8.6 732Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 29.0 22.0 7.0 25.6 594Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 9--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 72 7097Yes 1 72 7199Yes 1 20 1995Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 54 5296Yes 1 54 5398Yes 1 18----
Econ. Disadvantaged 51 4996Yes 1 51 5098Yes 1 16----
EL and Former EL 17---- 17---- 7----
Students w/ disabilities 7---- 7---- 3----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 35 35100Yes 1 35 35100Yes 1 6----
Hispanic/Latino 28 2697Yes 2 28 28100Yes 1 12----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. 1---- 1---- 0----
White 3---- 3---- 0----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles