Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Philbrick Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - John D Philbrick

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Boston (00350000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
John D Philbrick (00350172)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
42% - Partially meeting targets8

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44----
Mathematics achievement04----
Science achievement------
Achievement total4867.5---
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14----
Mathematics growth14----
Growth total2822.5---
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04----
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.0---
Weighted total3.27.6----
Percentage of possible points 42%---
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement---
Achievement total4867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total2822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total3.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 42%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 13

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 489.4 495.8 6.4 491.4 854Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 485.0 492.0 7.0 487.0 614Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 485.1 492.6 7.5 486.7 484Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 485.1 489.6 4.5 486.7 384Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 483.2 497.7 14.5 484.9 324Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 12--

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 488.2 487.3 -0.9 490.0 850Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 486.8 483.4 -3.4 488.7 620Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 488.0 483.6 -4.4 489.4 490Declined
EL and Former EL---- 21--
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 486.8 481.8 -5.0 488.6 390Declined
Hispanic/Latino 481.2 488.6 7.4 482.8 324Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 11--

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students---- 16--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 14--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 1--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 33.9 50.0 381Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 31.9 50.0 291Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.4 50.0 231Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 31.1 50.0 201Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 4--

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 37.4 50.0 371Below Target
Lowest Performing-----
High needs 39.2 50.0 291Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 41.6 50.0 232Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 10--
Students w/ disabilities-- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black 40.5 50.0 202Below Target
Hispanic/Latino-- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White-- 3--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.0 13.5 -1.5 10.1 1330Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 12.6 17.8 -5.2 10.3 900Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.2 21.5 -5.3 13.8 650Declined
EL and Former EL---- 33--
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black 8.1 17.2 -9.1 4.2 640Declined
Hispanic/Latino 17.6 14.0 3.6 14.2 433Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 0--
White---- 23--

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 91 9099Yes 1 92 9199Yes 1 18----
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 66 6598Yes 1 67 67100Yes 1 15----
Econ. Disadvantaged 52 5198Yes 1 52 52100Yes 1 12----
EL and Former EL 22 22100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1 6----
Students w/ disabilities 15---- 15---- 2----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian---------------
Afr. Amer./Black 44 4398Yes 1 45 45100Yes 1 12----
Hispanic/Latino 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 3---- 3---- 0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 12---- 12---- 1----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles