Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Intermediate

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - West Intermediate

Organization Information
District:Wilmington (03420000)School type:Elementary School
School:West Intermediate (03420080)Grades served:04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88, Target = 92.9CPI = 88, Target = 92.9CPI = 88, Target = 92.9 87.8 90.1 88.0 -2.1 92.9 93.9 6125125No Change
High needsCPI = 69.7, Target = 81.9CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.9CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.9 68.9 75.0 69.7 -5.3 81.9 84.5 23750Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.1, Target = 76.3CPI = 73.1, Target = 76.3CPI = 73.1, Target = 76.3 74.1 74.1 73.1 -1.0 76.3 87.1 312625No Change
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 64.2, Target = 78.4CPI = 64.2, Target = 78.4 63.0 69.3 64.2 -5.1 78.4 81.5 48580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.7, Target = 93.6CPI = 88.7, Target = 93.6CPI = 88.7, Target = 93.6 89.1 91.5 88.7 -2.8 93.6 94.6 522190Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.1CPI = 87.5, Target = 92.1 86.5 88.3 87.5 -0.8 92.1 93.3 5925125No Change
High needsCPI = 65.7, Target = 81.7CPI = 65.7, Target = 81.7CPI = 65.7, Target = 81.7 68.6 70.2 65.7 -4.5 81.7 84.3 14750Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.2, Target = 73.6CPI = 71.2, Target = 73.6CPI = 71.2, Target = 73.6 71.2 71.2 71.2 0.0 73.6 85.6 292625No Change
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.6, Target = 79.1CPI = 58.6, Target = 79.1CPI = 58.6, Target = 79.1 64.1 65.1 58.6 -6.5 79.1 82.1 33580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.2, Target = 92.1CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.1CPI = 88.2, Target = 92.1 86.5 89.6 88.2 -1.4 92.1 93.3 5221925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 83.1, Target = 89.7 82.4 83.1 83.1 0.0 89.7 91.2 5811825No Change
High needsCPI = 62.5, Target = 82.9CPI = 62.5, Target = 82.9CPI = 62.5, Target = 82.9 70.7 65.3 62.5 -2.8 82.9 85.4 34320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  67.3---- 83.7-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.8, Target = 89CPI = 85.8, Target = 89CPI = 85.8, Target = 89 81.2 83.0 85.8 2.8 89.0 90.6 549750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 21.5 17.52510 5.1 5.22510
High needs 4.3 4.0750 17.4 16.0750
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.4 7.7260 14.8 15.4260
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 1.7580 25.0 20.75825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.9 16.92190 4.1 4.62190
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 38.8 37.82510 7.1 6.82510
High needs 16.2 9.3750 19.1 22.7750
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.1 11.5260 19.2 19.2260
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 8.3 6.9580 25.0 29.3580
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.2 38.42190 5.5 5.92190
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 15.6 13.61180 7.4 9.31180
High needs 0.0 0.0320 22.6 28.1320
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--6---6-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.0 15.5970 7.6 6.29725
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0No24075On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 52.0 48.0 -4.0 51.0No6650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 52.0 56.0 4.0 51.0No2575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 50.0 45.0 -5.0 51.0No4950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 56.0 57.0 1.0 51.0No20875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 51 74.0 75.0 1.0 51.0No241100Above Target
High needsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 63.0 66.0 3.0 51.0No67100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51 57.0 76.0 19.0 51.0No25100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 58.0 55.0 -3.0 51.0No5075On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-9--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51SGP = 76, Target = 51 74.0 76.0 2.0 51.0No209100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students255255100Yes255254100Yes121121100Yes
High needs7676100Yes7676100Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2727100Yes2727100Yes13---
EL and Former EL3---3---2---
Students w/ disabilities5858100Yes5858100Yes2424100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian9---9---6---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---10---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White222222100Yes222221100Yes9999100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles