Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Glover
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Glover
Organization Information
District:Milton (01890000)School type:Elementary School
School:Glover (01890010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 92.8, Target = 96.9CPI = 92.8, Target = 96.9 94.7 90.6 92.8 2.2 96.9 97.4 8427875On Target
High needsCPI = 74.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 74.5, Target = 91.3CPI = 74.5, Target = 91.3 85.0 66.5 74.5 8.0 91.3 92.5 435450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.7, Target = 89.4CPI = 70.7, Target = 89.4CPI = 70.7, Target = 89.4 81.9 59.1 70.7 11.6 89.4 91.0 664750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black -------25--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.3, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.3, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.3, Target = 97.8 96.3 93.2 95.3 2.1 97.8 98.2 93219100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 94.1, Target = 95.9 92.9 92.2 94.1 1.9 95.9 96.5 90277100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82.5, Target = 90.3CPI = 82.5, Target = 90.3CPI = 82.5, Target = 90.3 83.3 74.1 82.5 8.4 90.3 91.7 785350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 81, Target = 90CPI = 81, Target = 90CPI = 81, Target = 90 82.8 69.5 81.0 11.5 90.0 91.4 904675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------12--
Afr. Amer./Black -------24--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.9, Target = 97CPI = 96.9, Target = 97 94.9 94.8 96.9 2.1 97.0 97.5 97219100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 92.2CPI = 92.4, Target = 92.2 86.7 84.1 92.4 8.3 92.2 93.4 9179100Above Target
High needsCPI = 78.8, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.8, Target = 86.4CPI = 78.8, Target = 86.4 76.7- 78.8 -11.5 86.4 88.4 84200Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------8--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 95.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 95.9, Target = 92.8 87.7 86.4 95.9 9.5 92.8 93.9 9661100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.5 20.12780 2.6 4.02780
High needs 1.8 3.75425 12.5 20.4540
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.14725 17.1 23.4470
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--25---25-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 23.8 22.42190 1.0 1.82190
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.6 56.027725 1.9 1.82770
High needs 10.7 24.55325 8.9 7.55325
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 7.3 19.64625 12.2 8.74625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--12---12-
Afr. Amer./Black--24---24-
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.6 60.721925 1.0 0.521925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 22.7 27.87925 6.8 2.57925
High needs 19.4 0.0200 0.0 10.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--8---8-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.1 32.86125 5.9 0.06125
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0Yes179100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 38.0 59.5 21.5 51.0Yes32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 47.5 59.0 11.5 51.0Yes2775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-16--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0Yes139100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 53.0 54.0 1.0 51.0Yes17875On Target
High needsSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 55.0 46.0 -9.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 58.5 49.5 -9.0 51.0Yes2675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 53.0 54.0 1.0 51.0Yes13975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students278278100Yes277277100Yes7979100Yes
High needs5454100Yes5353100Yes2020100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged14---13---8---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities4747100Yes4646100Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian12---12---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2525100Yes24---9---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White219219100Yes219219100Yes6161100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles