Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hannah Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hannah Elementary

Organization Information
District:Beverly (00300000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hannah Elementary (00300033)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 90.4, Target = 91.8CPI = 90.4, Target = 91.8 85.9 85.1 90.4 5.3 91.8 93.0 7219050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 85.2CPI = 80.6, Target = 85.2CPI = 80.6, Target = 85.2 74.6 70.2 80.6 10.4 85.2 87.3 727250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.2, Target = 78.2CPI = 83.2, Target = 78.2CPI = 83.2, Target = 78.2 76.2 76.2 83.2 7.0 78.2 88.1 8046100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.4, Target = 80.8CPI = 67.4, Target = 80.8CPI = 67.4, Target = 80.8 67.1 58.8 67.4 8.6 80.8 83.6 593650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 92.4CPI = 92.3, Target = 92.4 87.0 86.2 92.3 6.1 92.4 93.5 7415075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 90.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 90.8 84.2 83.3 85.9 2.6 90.8 92.1 5119050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 74.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 74.3, Target = 85.4 75.0 70.9 74.3 3.4 85.4 87.5 447250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.2, Target = 75.4CPI = 77.2, Target = 75.4CPI = 77.2, Target = 75.4 73.2 73.2 77.2 4.0 75.4 86.6 5246100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 61.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 61.8, Target = 82.9CPI = 61.8, Target = 82.9 70.7 62.5 61.8 -0.7 82.9 85.4 423625No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.8, Target = 92CPI = 87.8, Target = 92CPI = 87.8, Target = 92 86.3 84.5 87.8 3.3 92.0 93.2 4915050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 77.4, Target = 88CPI = 77.4, Target = 88CPI = 77.4, Target = 88 79.4 75.8 77.4 1.6 88.0 89.7 396250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.5, Target = 84.1CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.1CPI = 62.5, Target = 84.1 72.7 57.7 62.5 4.8 84.1 86.4 342450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 80.9, Target = 89.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 89.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 89.5 82.0 75.8 80.9 5.1 89.5 91.0 305150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 11.7 10.51900 7.8 4.719025
High needs 2.7 0.0720 17.8 12.57225
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.8 0.0460 16.7 10.94625
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 25.0 25.0360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.3 13.31500 6.7 2.715025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 18.3 27.919025 8.3 6.819025
High needs 8.2 15.37225 15.1 15.3720
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.9 15.24625 14.3 15.2460
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 2.5 8.33625 25.0 27.8360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.7 30.015025 7.3 5.315025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 6.2 9.76225 9.2 11.3620
High needs 0.0 0.0240 23.1 25.0240
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.0 9.85125 10.0 7.85125
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 48.0 66.5 18.5 51.0Yes114100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 31.5 56.5 25.0 51.0Yes46100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 31.0 56.5 25.5 51.0Yes28100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 31.0 46.5 15.5 51.0Yes24100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 43.5 69.0 25.5 51.0Yes89100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 51.0 50.0 -1.0 51.0Yes11475On Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 50.5 48.0 -2.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 45.0 50.0 5.0 51.0Yes2875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51 48.5 27.5 -21.0 51.0No240Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 51.0 49.0 -2.0 51.0Yes8975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19819397Yes19819397Yes6262100Yes
High needs777597Yes777597Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged494898Yes494898Yes13---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities393897Yes393897Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5---5---2---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino24---24---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15715297Yes15715297Yes5151100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles