Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Westport Middle-High School

Districts
Schools

2019

2019 Official Accountability Report - Westport Junior/Senior High School

Organization Information

DISTRICT NAME
Westport (03310000)

TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School

SCHOOL
Westport Junior/Senior High School (03310515)

GRADES SERVED
07,08,09,10,11,12

REGION
Coastal

FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classification

Not requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification

Substantial progress toward targets

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
57% - Substantial progress toward targets	48

OVERALL RESULTS
SUBGROUP RESULTS
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	29%	76%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	57%
	Substantial progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	3	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	7	12	67.5	8	8	67.5	12	12	47.5	11	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	4	4	-	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5	7	8	22.5	3	8	22.5	1	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	3	4	10.0	0	4	10.0	0	8	10.0	2	4	10.0
Weighted total		6.6	10.3	-	7.0	7.6	-	7.6	10.7	-	7.9	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		64%		-	92%		-	71%		-	77%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		78% Weight of non-high school results:45%						74% Weight of high school results:55%
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		76%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	3	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	3	4	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	9	12	67.5	3	8	67.5	0	12	47.5	0	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	3	4	-	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5	6	8	22.5	3	8	22.5	1	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	0	4	10.0	0	8	10.0	0	4	10.0
Weighted total		7.7	10.3	-	3.4	7.6	-	1.5	10.7	-	0.2	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		75%		-	45%		-	14%		-	2%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		60% Weight of non-high school results:40%						8% Weight of high school results:60%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		29%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

	2018	2019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage	46%	37%
Weight	40%	60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage (2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)	41%
	Moderate progress toward targets

2019 Points awarded

2019 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	5	12	67.5	3	8	70.0
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Growth total	5	8	22.5	-	-	-
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	3	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	2	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	2	4	10.0	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		4.7	10.3	-	2.7	8.8	-
Percentage of possible points		46%		-	31%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		46% Weight of non-high school results:45%			31% Weight of high school results:55%
2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		37%

2018 Points awarded

2018 Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	3	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	11	12	67.5	0	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Mathematics growth	4	4	-	1	4	-
	Growth total	7	8	22.5	1	4	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	8	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	1	4	10.0	0	8	10.0
Weighted total		9.1	10.3	-	1.8	9.8	-
Percentage of possible points		88%		-	18%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		88% Weight of non-high school results:40%			18% Weight of high school results:60%
2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage		46%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	500.8	502.0	1.2	501.8	258	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	476.5	484.6	8.1	481.6	25	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	491.5	491.9	0.4	492.9	77	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	62	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	30	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	500.7	502.5	1.8	502.0	236	3	Met Target

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.9	97.9	3.0	96.4	82	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	88.6	95.0	6.4	91.4	20	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	88.6	91.3	2.7	90.7	20	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	94.3	97.8	3.5	95.9	79	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	501.7	505.3	3.6	503.3	257	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	476.2	485.4	9.2	479.9	25	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	490.7	492.6	1.9	492.2	77	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	62	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	30	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	501.7	505.6	3.9	503.2	235	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	78.7	87.5	8.8	80.5	82	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	52.3	57.5	5.2	56.4	20	3	Met Target
High needs	64.8	61.3	-3.5	67.4	20	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	77.1	87.0	9.9	79.1	79	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	77.7	72.5	-5.2	80.4	111	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	66.7	62.9	-3.8	70.2	31	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	78.4	72.8	-5.6	81.3	101	0	Declined

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Achievement	2019 Achievement	Change	2019 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	85.4	93.9	8.5	87.3	74	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	68.2	78.8	10.6	71.4	20	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	83.2	93.7	10.5	85.0	71	4	Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	55.1	252	3	Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing	59.8	23	3	Typical Growth - High
High needs	49.8	72	2	Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	58	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	55.4	231	3	Typical Growth - High

English language arts growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	48.2	76	2	Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing	35.5	20	1	Low Growth
High needs	-	19	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	48.1	73	2	Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	63.5	251	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing	72.8	23	4	Exceeded Typical Growth
High needs	58.2	72	3	Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	58	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	25	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	63.8	230	4	Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
About the Data
Group	2019 Mean SGP	N	Points	Reason
All Students	35.6	76	1	Low Growth
Lowest Performing	27.9	20	0	Very Low Growth
High needs	-	19	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	14	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-
White	35.5	73	1	Low Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.8	93.1	-5.7	100.0	72	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	96.0	86.2	-9.8	99.9	29	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.7	93.9	-4.8	100.0	66	0	Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	91.4	98.8	7.4	100.0	81	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	84.1	96.0	11.9	-	25	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	91.0	98.7	7.7	100.0	77	3	Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	1.6	1.3	-0.3	1.4	317	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	2.2	3.0	0.8	2.0	100	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	76	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	46	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.8	1.0	-0.8	1.6	289	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	11.8	10.0	-1.8	10.3	269	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	8.0	20.0	12.0	3.4	25	0	Declined
High needs	21.8	21.4	-0.4	19.4	84	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	59	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.4	10.2	-2.2	10.6	245	3	Met Target

Chronic absenteeism - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	18.5	25.2	6.7	16.2	333	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	31.8	30.0	-1.8	26.0	20	2	Improved Below Target
High needs	32.7	43.9	11.2	28.9	114	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	79	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	48	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.9	25.6	6.7	16.4	308	0	Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
About the Data
Group	2018 Rate (%)	2019 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	59.4	0.0	-59.4	65.9	-	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	0.0	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	40.0	0.0	-40.0	47.4	-	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	60.3	0.0	-60.3	66.8	-	0	Declined

Assessment participation - All students
About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	345	342	99	Yes	1	344	341	99	Yes	1	199	195	98	Yes	1

Assessment participation - Subgroups
About the Data
Group	English language arts		Mathematics		Science		Overall
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Enrolled	Assessed	Total Enrolled	Total Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
High needs	102	99	102	99	56	54	260	252	97	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	80	79	80	79	41	40	201	198	99	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	41	39	41	39	22	21	104	99	95	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	1	1	1	1	1	3	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	2	2	2	2	2	6	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	2	2	2	1	1	5	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	11	11	11	11	4	4	26	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	9	9	9	9	5	5	23	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	320	317	319	316	186	182	825	815	99	Yes	1

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Resources

Interpretive Materials

Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms