Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nipmuc Regional High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Nipmuc Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Mendon-Upton (07100000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Nipmuc Regional High (07100510)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement14-14-
Science achievement34-04-
Achievement total81247.551267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total61220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion24----
Additional indicators total2810.00410.0
Weighted total6.610.7-4.110.3-
Percentage of possible points 62%-40%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage51%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement14-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total11247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate04-
High school completion total41220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total3.010.7-
Percentage of possible points 28%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage28%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 64

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 99.2 -0.3 100.0 1494Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.0 98.0 0.0 99.4 384Exceeded Target
High needs 97.9 95.8 -2.1 99.5 301No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 99.1 -0.4 100.0 1344Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.3 95.8 -1.5 98.8 1481No Change
Lowest Performing 89.2 88.2 -1.0 91.2 381No Change
High needs 89.6 82.5 -7.1 91.8 300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.1 96.1 -2.0 99.7 1331No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.3 96.7 -1.6 99.7 1443Met Target
Lowest Performing 94.6 91.4 -3.2 96.7 380Declined
High needs 95.5 87.1 -8.4 97.8 290Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.4 96.4 -2.0 99.8 1321No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.2 50.0 1363Met Target
Lowest Performing 37.8 50.0 321Below Target
High needs 44.3 50.0 232Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.8 50.0 1253Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 53.9 50.0 1363Met Target
Lowest Performing 40.0 50.0 322Below Target
High needs 61.5 50.0 234Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 53.5 50.0 1253Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.5 92.9 -1.6 95.7 1270Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.2 80.6 -9.6 93.4 310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 22--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 93.4 -1.5 96.3 1220Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 96.4 1.5 95.9 1653Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 82.7 95.1 12.4 85.5 614Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 32--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.4 96.8 2.4 95.5 1564Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.3 0.7 -0.4 1.0 5833Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.7 2.8 -2.1 1.0 1090Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 54--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 64--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.3 0.7 -0.4 1.0 5363Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 10.9 14.4 -3.5 9.9 6340Declined
Lowest Performing 10.8 18.4 -7.6 5.5 380Declined
High needs 21.7 31.5 -9.8 19.0 1270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 56--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 70--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 10.7 13.7 -3.0 9.4 5760Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.6 76.4 0.8 78.8 3092Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 32.5 43.4 10.9 40.5 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 27--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 75.6 77.0 1.4 78.6 2822Improved Below Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 155 15499Yes 1 154 15299Yes 1 155 15499Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 33 33100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 33 33100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 16---- 15---- 16----
EL and Former EL 3---- 2---- 3----
Students w/ disabilities 20 20100Yes 1 19---- 20 20100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 4---- 4---- 4----
Afr. Amer./Black 3---- 3---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 5---- 4---- 5----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 138 138100Yes 1 138 13799Yes 1 138 138100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles