Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lake View

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lake View

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Worcester (03480000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
SCHOOL
Lake View (03480145)
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06
REGION
West/Central
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
35% - Partially meeting targets31

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-24-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement34----
Achievement total51260.02867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-24-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total4820.03822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total3410.0---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total0410.00410.0
Weighted total4.19.6-2.07.6-
Percentage of possible points 43%-26%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage35%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement24-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total51267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total0410.0
Weighted total4.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 42%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 43

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 494.3 494.5 0.2 495.8 1422Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 468.7 471.4 2.7 474.2 232Improved Below Target
High needs 490.5 490.7 0.2 492.3 1072Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.7 490.7 3.0 489.0 684Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 495.6 496.8 1.2 496.9 603Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 475.3 470.1 -5.2 477.1 260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 487.2 485.8 -1.4 488.7 260Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 496.3 494.1 -2.2 498.0 740Declined

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.4 493.8 -2.6 497.9 1420Declined
Lowest Performing 469.0 467.8 -1.2 472.0 230Declined
High needs 492.4 489.9 -2.5 494.0 1070Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 490.6 490.3 -0.3 491.6 681No Change
EL and Former EL 498.2 494.2 -4.0 499.7 600Declined
Students w/ disabilities 473.3 467.8 -5.5 475.1 260Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino 489.0 483.7 -5.3 490.6 260Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 498.6 495.9 -2.7 500.3 740Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 68.6 71.8 3.2 71.3 313Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 61.2 64.3 3.1 64.6 213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 11--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 17--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 40.2 50.0 992Below Target
Lowest Performing 40.3 50.0 232Below Target
High needs 41.4 50.0 742Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.0 50.0 441Below Target
EL and Former EL 46.6 50.0 422Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 32.3 50.0 541Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 47.5 50.0 992Below Target
Lowest Performing 38.7 50.0 231Below Target
High needs 44.4 50.0 742Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 43.1 50.0 442Below Target
EL and Former EL 46.5 50.0 422Below Target
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 10--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 11--
Hispanic/Latino-- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 47.0 50.0 542Below Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 84.5 70.5 -14.0 62.8 613Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 84.5 70.5 -14.0 62.8 613Met Target
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 3.7 4.5 -0.8 2.4 2450Declined
Lowest Performing 0.0 8.7 -8.7 0.0 230Declined
High needs 3.9 4.9 -1.0 1.6 1830Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.1 5.9 -1.8 1.0 1020Declined
EL and Former EL 3.6 8.2 -4.6 0.9 1100Declined
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 10.0 -7.1 0.0 400Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 23--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 33--
Hispanic/Latino 2.4 10.9 -8.5 0.0 460Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 14--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 3.1 2.1 3.5 1283Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 155 155100Yes 1 155 155100Yes 1 34 34100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 119 119100Yes 1 119 119100Yes 1 23 23100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 76 76100Yes 1 76 76100Yes 1 12----
EL and Former EL 68 68100Yes 1 68 68100Yes 1 12----
Students w/ disabilities 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 7----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 1---- 1---- 0----
Asian 14---- 14---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 19---- 19---- 6----
Hispanic/Latino 29 29100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1 7----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 11---- 11---- 3----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 81 81100Yes 1 81 81100Yes 1 17----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles