Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Haggerty

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Haggerty

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Cambridge (00490000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Haggerty (00490020)
GRADES SERVED
PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement04----
Achievement total81267.58867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism34-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total3410.04410.0
Weighted total7.110.3-6.97.6-
Percentage of possible points 69%-91%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement---
Achievement total8867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total7.27.6-
Percentage of possible points 95%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage95%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 69

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 496.0 502.8 6.8 497.5 954Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 479.9 488.6 8.7 484.6 204Exceeded Target
High needs 489.4 496.7 7.3 491.0 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 487.0 496.8 9.8 488.4 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 486.9 489.8 2.9 488.6 254Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black 490.1 499.5 9.4 491.7 214Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 502.0 504.1 2.1 503.6 443Met Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 492.7 498.7 6.0 494.1 954Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 467.9 473.7 5.8 471.5 204Exceeded Target
High needs 484.4 489.7 5.3 486.1 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 482.3 489.4 7.1 483.4 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 481.2 482.1 0.9 483.3 252Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black 489.6 491.2 1.6 491.1 213Met Target
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 495.3 501.4 6.1 496.8 444Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.6 69.8 -10.8 83.0 290Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 18--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 10--

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 57.5 50.0 623Met Target
Lowest Performing 58.3 50.0 203Met Target
High needs 56.5 50.0 363Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 56.9 50.0 233Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 49.6 50.0 272Below Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.8 50.0 623Met Target
Lowest Performing 49.9 50.0 202Below Target
High needs 56.6 50.0 363Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 55.8 50.0 233Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 9--
Students w/ disabilities-- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 14--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 60.4 50.0 274Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.8 5.4 1.4 5.7 1853Met Target
Lowest Performing 20.0 15.0 5.0 16.4 204Exceeded Target
High needs 13.5 9.4 4.1 11.1 854Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.0 16.3 0.7 13.5 492Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 16.7 10.3 6.4 13.4 394Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 24--
Afr. Amer./Black 7.0 8.1 -1.1 3.2 370Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.7 2.3 1.4 2.4 864Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 96 96100Yes 1 96 96100Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 51 51100Yes 1 51 51100Yes 1 18----
Econ. Disadvantaged 32 32100Yes 1 32 32100Yes 1 13----
EL and Former EL 15---- 15---- 5----
Students w/ disabilities 25 25100Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1 9----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 13---- 13---- 3----
Afr. Amer./Black 21 21100Yes 1 21 21100Yes 1 7----
Hispanic/Latino 5---- 5---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 13---- 13---- 6----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 44 44100Yes 1 44 44100Yes 1 10----


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles