Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Andover High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Andover High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Andover (00090000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Andover High (00090505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement34-24-
Science achievement34-24-
Achievement total101247.581267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-14-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total4822.53822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate34----
Extended engagement rate34----
Annual dropout rate34----
High school completion total91220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-24-
Advanced coursework completion34----
Additional indicators total3810.02410.0
Weighted total7.810.7-6.310.3-
Percentage of possible points 73%-61%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage67%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement14-
Science achievement34-
Achievement total81247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth34-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate34-
Annual dropout rate34-
High school completion total101220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion04-
Additional indicators total0810.0
Weighted total6.710.7-
Percentage of possible points 63%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage63%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 79

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 99.6 0.9 100.0 4234Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.9 99.3 2.4 98.3 1124Exceeded Target
High needs 95.0 98.8 3.8 96.6 1054Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.9 99.3 3.4 97.8 374Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 93.3 98.4 5.1 95.2 764Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.6 100.0 0.4 100.0 664Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.9 99.6 0.7 100.0 3144Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.5 97.0 -0.5 99.0 4223Met Target
Lowest Performing 90.5 90.6 0.1 92.5 1122Improved Below Target
High needs 91.1 90.4 -0.7 93.3 1041No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.3 91.7 0.4 93.3 362Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 88.3 87.8 -0.5 91.3 761No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 99.6 99.6 0.0 100.0 664Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.8 96.7 -1.1 99.4 3141No Change

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.4 95.0 0.6 95.8 4143Met Target
Lowest Performing 83.8 84.6 0.8 85.9 1122Improved Below Target
High needs 84.4 87.1 2.7 86.7 1013Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 86.9 87.1 0.2 88.8 352Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 80.5 83.8 3.3 82.8 743Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 97.9 99.2 1.3 99.7 644Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.4 94.5 0.1 95.8 3102Improved Below Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.7 50.0 3811Below Target
Lowest Performing 34.6 50.0 1031Below Target
High needs 39.7 50.0 921Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.7 50.0 281Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 41.6 50.0 692Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 42.2 50.0 592Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 38.5 50.0 2891Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.0 50.0 3823Met Target
Lowest Performing 46.8 50.0 1042Below Target
High needs 52.8 50.0 923Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.9 50.0 282Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 55.1 50.0 693Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian 46.4 50.0 592Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black-- 6--
Hispanic/Latino-- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 57.6 50.0 2903Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.7 97.2 1.5 96.9 4623Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.0 91.5 4.5 90.2 1184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 84.3 94.1 9.8 88.3 514Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 81.7 87.2 5.5 86.3 784Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 624Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 96.9 1.6 96.7 3523Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 98.9 0.8 99.1 4413Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.9 98.1 2.2 98.7 1083Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.0 96.0 0.0 100.0 513Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 93.1 98.6 5.5 96.6 714Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 644Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.5 98.8 0.3 99.6 3393Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.3 -0.2 1.0 1,7883Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.8 -0.8 1.0 3593Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.0 -1.0 1.0 1023Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.1 -1.1 1.0 2720Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2614Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 34--
Hispanic/Latino---- 91--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 39--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.1 0.2 -0.1 1.0 1,3623Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.4 12.4 -3.0 8.4 1,7740Declined
Lowest Performing 10.2 9.8 0.4 4.9 1122Improved Below Target
High needs 19.2 23.0 -3.8 16.5 3650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.6 27.2 -2.6 20.8 1140Declined
EL and Former EL---- 34--
Students w/ disabilities 20.3 22.8 -2.5 16.4 2500Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 3.4 5.5 -2.1 1.3 2934Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 40--
Hispanic/Latino---- 86--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 39--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 9.6 13.1 -3.5 8.3 1,3160Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 86.2 85.9 -0.3 89.4 8653Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 54.3 46.9 -7.4 62.3 1620Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 69.4 65.4 -4.0 77.9 520Declined
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 42.5 36.1 -6.4 50.0 1190Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 94.4 95.4 1.0 100.0 1314Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 19--
Hispanic/Latino---- 35--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 85.9 85.8 -0.1 88.9 6623Met Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 430 42799Yes 1 429 42699Yes 1 430 430100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 110 10797Yes 1 109 10697Yes 1 110 110100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 40 3895Yes 1 39 3795Yes 1 40 40100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 6---- 6---- 6----
Students w/ disabilities 79 7797Yes 1 79 7797Yes 1 79 79100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 66 66100Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1 66 66100Yes 1
Afr. Amer./Black 9---- 9---- 9----
Hispanic/Latino 26 2596Yes 1 26 2596Yes 1 26 26100Yes 1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 9---- 9---- 9----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 320 31899Yes 1 319 31799Yes 1 320 320100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles