Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Amesbury High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Amesbury High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Amesbury (00070000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
SCHOOL
Amesbury High (00070505)
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
REGION
Coastal
FEDERAL DESIGNATION
-

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement44-44-
Science achievement34-24-
Achievement total111247.5101267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-24-
Mathematics growth34-34-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate24----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total101220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism24-04-
Advanced coursework completion44----
Additional indicators total6810.00410.0
Weighted total9.210.7-7.910.3-
Percentage of possible points 86%-77%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage82%
Meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement34-
Mathematics achievement44-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth44-
Growth total6822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate04-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total81220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-
Advanced coursework completion44-
Additional indicators total4810.0
Weighted total8.610.7-
Percentage of possible points 80%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage80%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments 76

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.4 98.6 1.2 98.8 1424Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 90.2 95.0 4.8 92.0 354Exceeded Target
High needs 91.7 94.2 2.5 93.7 303Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 98.5 0.2 99.6 1314Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.5 96.5 3.0 95.2 1414Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 77.3 86.8 9.5 80.1 344Exceeded Target
High needs 83.9 87.5 3.6 86.0 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.0 96.2 2.2 95.6 1303Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.4 94.7 2.3 94.1 1323Met Target
Lowest Performing 80.3 82.9 2.6 84.6 352Improved Below Target
High needs 78.9 85.3 6.4 81.7 294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.2 94.3 1.1 95.0 1233Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 56.4 50.0 1313Met Target
Lowest Performing 45.3 50.0 312Below Target
High needs 47.4 50.0 262Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 56.9 50.0 1223Met Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 55.1 50.0 1303Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.0 50.0 303Met Target
High needs 65.4 50.0 264Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 11--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 54.5 50.0 1213Met Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.9 94.2 0.3 96.2 1542Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 86.4 84.2 -2.2 90.5 570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 52--
EL and Former EL---- 0--
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.4 94.4 0.0 96.5 1431No Change

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 91.9 97.5 5.6 93.6 1634Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 80.0 93.2 13.2 84.0 594Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 44--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.3 97.9 5.6 94.1 1444Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.8 0.2 0.6 1.0 5934Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.3 0.0 2.3 2.1 1534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 86--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 100--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 25--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.9 0.2 0.7 1.0 5384Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.7 14.4 0.3 13.6 5892Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 18.2 28.6 -10.4 11.6 350Declined
High needs 24.8 29.1 -4.3 22.4 1510Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 78--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 77--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 39--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 20--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.2 12.9 1.3 13.0 5113Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.1 95.5 36.4 64.8 2884Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 24.7 78.4 53.7 33.2 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 35--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 51--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 61.4 95.3 33.9 66.7 2564Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 142 142100Yes 1 142 14199Yes 1 142 142100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1 30 30100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 15---- 15---- 15----
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 19---- 19---- 19----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 2---- 2---- 2----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 6---- 6---- 6----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 2---- 2---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 131 131100Yes 1 131 13099Yes 1 131 131100Yes 1


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles