Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Collegiate Charter School of Lowell
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Lowell Collegiate Charter School
Organization Information
District:Lowell Collegiate Charter School (District) (35030000)School type:Elementary School
School:Lowell Collegiate Charter School (35030205)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Insufficient data
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 74.3CPI = 84.9, Target = 74.3CPI = 84.9, Target = 74.3 69.1 81.1 84.9 3.8 74.3 84.6 47205100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.3, Target = 72.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 72.1CPI = 81.3, Target = 72.1 66.5 79.5 81.3 1.8 72.1 83.3 76136100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 77.6CPI = 83.3, Target = 77.6CPI = 83.3, Target = 77.6 75.6 75.6 83.3 7.7 77.6 87.8 8190100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 79.5, Target = 83.2CPI = 79.5, Target = 83.2CPI = 79.5, Target = 83.2 81.7 81.7 79.5 -2.2 83.2 90.9 777225No Change
Students w/ disabilities -------27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------49--
Afr. Amer./Black -------37--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 83.7, Target = 74.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 74.4CPI = 83.7, Target = 74.4 72.1 72.1 83.7 11.6 74.4 86.1 8869100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 82.2CPI = 91.1, Target = 82.2CPI = 91.1, Target = 82.2 78.6 87.9 91.1 3.2 82.2 89.3 6742100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.6, Target = 84.1CPI = 82.6, Target = 84.1CPI = 82.6, Target = 84.1 80.9 82.7 82.6 -0.1 84.1 90.5 3720625No Change
High needsCPI = 79.4, Target = 81.2CPI = 79.4, Target = 81.2CPI = 79.4, Target = 81.2 77.4 79.5 79.4 -0.1 81.2 88.7 6513725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.9, Target = 79.2CPI = 79.9, Target = 79.2 77.3 77.3 79.9 2.6 79.2 88.7 669175On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 78.1, Target = 83.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 83.2CPI = 78.1, Target = 83.2 81.7 81.7 78.1 -3.6 83.2 90.9 63730Declined
Students w/ disabilities -------27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------49--
Afr. Amer./Black -------37--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.4, Target = 79.7CPI = 76.4, Target = 79.7CPI = 76.4, Target = 79.7 77.9 77.9 76.4 -1.5 79.7 89.0 636925No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.2, Target = 89.1CPI = 87.2, Target = 89.1CPI = 87.2, Target = 89.1 86.9 85.9 87.2 1.3 89.1 93.5 454350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------58--
High needs -------41--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------30--
EL and Former EL -------18--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------15--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.8 10.720525 5.7 4.420525
High needs 1.5 5.913625 6.1 5.91360
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 5.69025 9.3 6.79025
EL and Former EL 3.3 5.67225 3.3 6.9720
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--49---49-
Afr. Amer./Black--37---37-
Hispanic/Latino 2.9 11.66925 11.4 5.86925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 3.2 16.74225 0.0 2.4420
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.8 20.420625 6.5 6.32060
High needs 13.6 13.91370 10.6 9.513725
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.3 14.39125 14.0 9.99125
EL and Former EL 20.0 12.3730 6.7 9.6730
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--49---49-
Afr. Amer./Black--37---37-
Hispanic/Latino 11.4 15.96925 14.3 10.16925
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.8 27.94325 3.1 4.7430
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--58---58-
High needs--41---41-
Econ. Disadvantaged--30---30-
EL and Former EL--18---18-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--15---15-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 70.0 50.0 -20.0 51.0Yes10675On Target
High needsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 73.0 49.5 -23.5 51.0Yes7275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-50--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-32--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-40--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-27--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 42.5 45.0 2.5 51.0No10950Below Target
High needsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 46.0 45.5 -0.5 51.0No7450Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-51--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-34--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-18--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-29--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 72.0 60.04525
High needs 72.0 60.04525
EL and Former EL 72.0 60.04525
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students21220999Yes21221099Yes616098Yes
High needs14214099Yes14214199Yes444398Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged939198Yes939299Yes323197Yes
EL and Former EL777699Yes7777100Yes21---
Students w/ disabilities282796Yes282796Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian5050100Yes5050100Yes15---
Afr. Amer./Black3737100Yes3737100Yes8---
Hispanic/Latino727199Yes727199Yes19---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White444398Yes4444100Yes16---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles