Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Clyde Reeves
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Clyde Reeves
Organization Information
District:Woburn (03470000)School type:Elementary School
School:Clyde Reeves (03470040)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 96CPI = 90, Target = 96CPI = 90, Target = 96 93.2 90.3 90.0 -0.3 96.0 96.6 7021725No Change
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 92.7CPI = 79.5, Target = 92.7CPI = 79.5, Target = 92.7 87.5 81.9 79.5 -2.4 92.7 93.8 688325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 79.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 79.8, Target = 86.3 85.1 85.1 79.8 -5.3 86.3 92.6 64310Declined
EL and Former EL -------16--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74, Target = 94.2CPI = 74, Target = 94.2CPI = 74, Target = 94.2 90.1 75.5 74.0 -1.5 94.2 95.1 755225No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------21--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7CPI = 90.3, Target = 96.7 94.3 90.4 90.3 -0.1 96.7 97.2 6317025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.9, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.9, Target = 92.8 87.7 89.4 91.9 2.5 92.8 93.9 7921675On Target
High needsCPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.2 81.4 79.2 83.8 4.6 89.2 90.7 828250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.7, Target = 82.7CPI = 84.7, Target = 82.7CPI = 84.7, Target = 82.7 81.1 81.1 84.7 3.6 82.7 90.6 8331100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------15--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.9, Target = 87.1CPI = 77.9, Target = 87.1CPI = 77.9, Target = 87.1 77.9 74.5 77.9 3.4 87.1 89.0 835250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------13--
Afr. Amer./Black -------21--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 88.7 92.5 3.8 93.2 94.2 7716975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.4, Target = 96.9CPI = 91.4, Target = 96.9CPI = 91.4, Target = 96.9 94.6 85.8 91.4 5.6 96.9 97.3 887075On Target
High needsCPI = 85.9, Target = 94.5CPI = 85.9, Target = 94.5CPI = 85.9, Target = 94.5 90.5 77.7 85.9 8.2 94.5 95.3 962375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------7--
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilities -------13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.9, Target = 97CPI = 89.9, Target = 97CPI = 89.9, Target = 97 94.9 87.3 89.9 2.6 97.0 97.5 755775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.7 17.52170 2.6 4.62170
High needs 6.0 7.28325 7.2 10.8830
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.1 9.73125 2.7 9.7310
EL and Former EL--16---16-
Students w/ disabilities 3.8 3.8520 11.3 15.4520
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--21---21-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.7 15.31700 2.9 4.71700
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 37.4 38.02160 4.4 1.421625
High needs 18.1 18.3820 10.8 3.78225
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.2 22.63125 8.1 3.23125
EL and Former EL--15---15-
Students w/ disabilities 13.2 17.35225 13.2 5.85225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--13---13-
Afr. Amer./Black--21---21-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 36.6 37.31690 4.7 1.816925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.1 28.67025 1.2 1.4700
High needs 7.1 17.42325 3.6 4.3230
Econ. Disadvantaged--7---7-
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities--13---13-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.5 26.35725 0.0 1.8570
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 72.0 53.0 -19.0 51.0No14075On Target
High needsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 73.5 47.5 -26.0 51.0No5050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 70.5 47.0 -23.5 51.0No2950Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 71.5 51.5 -20.0 51.0No10875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 72.0 53.0 -19.0 51.0Yes13975On Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 65.0 39.0 -26.0 51.0Yes4975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 73.0 43.0 -30.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-13--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-10--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 71.0 55.0 -16.0 51.0Yes10775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students224223100Yes22422299Yes737299Yes
High needs8787100Yes878699Yes252496Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged3333100Yes3333100Yes8---
EL and Former EL18---18---7---
Students w/ disabilities5454100Yes5454100Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian15---15---6---
Afr. Amer./Black24---24---7---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White171171100Yes17117099Yes585798Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles