Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Calvin Coolidge School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Calvin Coolidge
Organization Information
District:Shrewsbury (02710000)School type:Elementary School
School:Calvin Coolidge (02710015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 96.4CPI = 91, Target = 96.4CPI = 91, Target = 96.4 93.9 91.5 91.0 -0.5 96.4 97.0 7415925No Change
High needsCPI = 85.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 85.3, Target = 92.8CPI = 85.3, Target = 92.8 87.7 85.4 85.3 -0.1 92.8 93.9 886325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.1, Target = 92.1CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.1CPI = 83.1, Target = 92.1 91.4 91.4 83.1 -8.3 92.1 95.7 79310Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 90.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 90.7, Target = 93.4CPI = 90.7, Target = 93.4 88.6- 90.7 14.1 93.4 94.3 962775On Target
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97.4, Target = 99CPI = 97.4, Target = 99CPI = 97.4, Target = 99 98.3 93.6 97.4 3.8 99.0 99.2 8738100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9 93.0 90.1 87.9 -2.2 95.9 96.5 498925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.9, Target = 95.9 92.9 90.0 87.9 -2.1 95.9 96.5 6115925No Change
High needsCPI = 82.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 92.1CPI = 82.9, Target = 92.1 86.5 83.3 82.9 -0.4 92.1 93.3 796325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 78.2, Target = 88.2CPI = 78.2, Target = 88.2 87.1 87.1 78.2 -8.9 88.2 93.6 57310Declined
EL and Former ELCPI = 88.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 88.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 88.9, Target = 90.1 83.0- 88.9 4.5 90.1 91.5 882775On Target
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 96.7, Target = 98.1CPI = 96.7, Target = 98.1CPI = 96.7, Target = 98.1 96.7 95.6 96.7 1.1 98.1 98.4 5838100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 85.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 85.4, Target = 95.5 92.2 86.4 85.4 -1.0 95.5 96.1 368925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 20.9 27.015925 2.5 3.81590
High needs 10.0 17.56325 5.0 7.9630
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 9.7310 0.0 12.9310
EL and Former EL 9.4 22.22725 9.4 7.42725
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 35.3 47.43825 2.0 0.03825
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.5 21.38925 2.4 5.6890
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.6 47.21590 4.4 5.71590
High needs 33.3 31.7630 8.3 9.5630
Econ. Disadvantaged 34.5 22.6310 6.9 16.1310
EL and Former EL 28.1 44.42725 3.1 3.7270
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 68.6 68.4380 2.0 0.03825
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.3 41.68925 6.0 6.7890
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 65.0 57.0 -8.0 51.0No7175On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 65.0 50.0 -15.0 51.0No2750Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 51.0 57.0 6.0 51.0No4675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 74.0 59.0 -15.0 51.0No7175On Target
High needsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 76.0 52.0 -24.0 51.0Yes2775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-13--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-15--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51SGP = 59.5, Target = 51 60.0 59.5 -0.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019-
High needs- 60.019-
EL and Former EL- 60.019-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16616499Yes169169100Yes----
High needs686697Yes7070100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged3232100Yes3434100Yes----
EL and Former EL323097Yes3434100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities23---23-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian403998Yes4242100Yes----
Afr. Amer./Black8---8-------
Hispanic/Latino20---20-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White9090100Yes9191100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles