Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Rogers STEM Academy
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Rogers Early Learning Center
Organization Information
District:Lowell (01600000)School type:Elementary School
School:Rogers Early Learning Center (01600005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Insufficient data
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------82--
High needs -------71--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------65--
EL and Former EL -------32--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------42--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students -------82--
High needs -------71--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------65--
EL and Former EL -------32--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------18--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------42--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------9--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--82---82-
High needs--71---71-
Econ. Disadvantaged--65---65-
EL and Former EL--32---32-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--42---42-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--9---9-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--82---82-
High needs--71---71-
Econ. Disadvantaged--65---65-
EL and Former EL--32---32-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--18---18-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--42---42-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--9---9-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0----
High needs --- 51.0----
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0----
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 51.0----
High needs --- 51.0----
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0----
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0----
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 75.0 60.086-
High needs 75.0 60.086-
EL and Former EL 75.0 60.086-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students9494100Yes9595100Yes----
High needs8383100Yes8484100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged7575100Yes7676100Yes----
EL and Former EL4141100Yes4242100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities10---11-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian20---21-------
Afr. Amer./Black14---14-------
Hispanic/Latino4747100Yes4747100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White11---11-------

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles