Massachusetts School and District Profiles

City on a Hill Charter Public School Dudley Square

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

This organization is currently closed.


2019 Official Accountability Report - City on a Hill Charter Public School Dudley Square

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
City on a Hill Charter Public School Dudley Square (District) (35040000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Limited or no progress toward targets

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage29%9%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
17%
Limited or no progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage9%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage29%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage43%13%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
25%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage13% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage43%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
39

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 93.3 -4.5 99.3 450Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 97.5 91.4 -6.1 99.6 350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.0 91.7 -5.3 99.1 270Declined
EL and Former EL---- 18--
Students w/ disabilities---- 8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 97.3 92.0 -5.3 99.2 280Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.4 84.1 -4.3 90.2 440Declined
Lowest Performing---- 19--
High needs 87.5 80.9 -6.6 90.1 340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 86.6 82.7 -3.9 89.2 260Declined
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 89.1 85.7 -3.4 92.1 280Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.2 74.4 -1.8 78.1 441No Change
Lowest Performing---- 19--
High needs 75.4 69.1 -6.3 77.8 340Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 71.2 73.1 1.9 73.5 263Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 17--
Students w/ disabilities---- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 77.5 72.3 -5.2 80.4 280Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 24.7 330Very Low Growth
Lowest Performing- 15--
High needs 24.6 250Very Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.6 210Very Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 15--
Students w/ disabilities- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 18--
Hispanic/Latino- 13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White----

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 43.9 322Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing- 14--
High needs 41.1 242Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.1 202Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 14--
Students w/ disabilities- 3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 18--
Hispanic/Latino- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White----

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 72.5 71.2 -1.3 74.6 520Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 71.1 66.7 -4.4 75.0 450Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 72.7 71.8 -0.9 76.8 390Declined
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 66.7 60.0 -6.7 74.0 300Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students---- 48--
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 42--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 42--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 37--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.8 2.2 0.4 1.6 2720Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.5 1.4 -1.1 2.3 2094Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 1.9 -0.1 1.8 1582Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 52--
Students w/ disabilities---- 59--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black 0.0 2.6 2.6 1.0 1900Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 68--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White---- 1--

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 36.4 15.7 -20.7 42.4 510Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL---- 51--
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 22.5 32.7 10.2 20.2 2510Declined
Lowest Performing---- 20--
High needs 24.0 35.8 11.8 20.2 2120Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.8 36.8 5.0 26.7 1440Declined
EL and Former EL---- 94--
Students w/ disabilities---- 64--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black 22.3 33.9 11.6 19.2 1680Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 70--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 4--

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 75.2 60.7 -14.5 81.7 1120Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 72.2 58.2 -14.0 79.6 910Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.0 65.2 -11.8 84.8 660Declined
EL and Former EL---- 33--
Students w/ disabilities---- 29--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black 69.9 58.8 -11.1 78.1 850Declined
Hispanic/Latino---- 23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White---- 1--


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles