Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bristol County Agricultural High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Bristol County Agricultural High
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Bristol County Agricultural (09100000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal		GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
47% - Moderate progress toward targets60.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57%40%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		47%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage40%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage57%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%57%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		55%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage52%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
75

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 99.1 0.9 99.6 1104Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.5 96.7 3.2 95.5 303Met Target
High needs 94.7 97.9 3.2 96.6 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 99.3 -0.7 100.0 364Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.8 98.9 0.1 100.0 924Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.9 92.0 -1.9 95.6 1101No Change
Lowest Performing 77.5 72.5 -5.0 80.2 300Declined
High needs 85.8 85.1 -0.7 88.1 471No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.1 91.7 0.6 93.9 362Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.8 93.8 -2.0 97.5 921No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.4 93.4 -3.0 98.1 1100Declined
Lowest Performing 88.7 80.0 -8.7 92.2 300Declined
High needs 92.1 89.9 -2.2 94.7 471No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.4 92.4 -5.0 100.0 360Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 93.8 -3.9 99.6 920Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 39.2 971Low Growth
Lowest Performing 25.0 240Very Low Growth
High needs 37.9 421Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 39.1 331Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 41.9 832Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 44.5 972Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 39.8 241Low Growth
High needs 45.6 422Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 49.0 332Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 44.5 832Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1064Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 334Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1044Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1074Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 414Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 314Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1034Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1464Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1014Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 65--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4204Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 8.6 7.9 0.0 4553Met Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 300Declined
High needs 1.4 13.3 11.9 0.0 1660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.2 15.6 13.4 0.0 1090Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 60--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.7 8.3 7.6 0.0 4243Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 19.0 24.0 5.0 23.4 2213Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 8.9 10.9 2.0 16.0 642Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.2 13.7 1.5 19.9 512Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 19.8 23.1 3.3 24.8 2162Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles