Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Upper Cape Cod Vocational Technical
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Upper Cape Cod Regional Vocational Technical (08790000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal		GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
68% - Substantial progress toward targets69.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage78%61%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		68%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage61%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage78%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage86%61%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		71%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage86%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
89

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.3 0.2 100.0 1804Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.5 97.2 0.7 98.5 452Improved Below Target
High needs 98.3 98.6 0.3 100.0 744Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.0 98.5 -0.5 100.0 494Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 96.2 97.9 1.7 98.1 354Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.2 99.3 0.1 100.0 1534Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.0 94.5 1.5 94.7 1773Met Target
Lowest Performing 72.7 80.2 7.5 75.4 434Exceeded Target
High needs 86.5 89.6 3.1 88.8 723Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.8 93.2 4.4 91.6 484Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 75.0 80.9 5.9 77.6 344Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.3 94.8 1.5 95.0 1503Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 89.6 87.6 -2.0 91.3 1751No Change
Lowest Performing 72.2 70.6 -1.6 75.7 451No Change
High needs 84.4 83.8 -0.6 87.0 711No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.9 87.0 1.1 88.7 482Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 76.5 75.0 -1.5 79.2 331No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.2 87.3 -3.9 93.1 1480Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.0 1713Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 42.0 422Typical Growth - Low
High needs 51.2 723Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.6 482Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 60.3 344Exceeded Typical Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 2--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 8--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 51.0 1453Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 54.7 1703Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 38.8 411Low Growth
High needs 52.7 713Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.1 483Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 333Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 2--
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black- 8--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 54.6 1433Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.6 97.1 -0.5 99.4 1713Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.3 94.1 -2.2 99.7 850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.9 94.0 -2.9 100.0 670Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 92.6 90.9 -1.7 98.3 330Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.4 97.4 0.0 99.2 1543Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 98.8 -1.2 100.0 1673Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 98.8 -1.2 100.0 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 100.0 98.5 -1.5 100.0 653Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 96.3 -3.7 100.0 273Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 98.7 -1.3 100.0 1553Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.3 0.2 1.0 7153Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.0 2843Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 1883Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.8 0.0 -0.8 1.0 1274Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 37--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 6123Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.7 11.9 0.2 10.4 7061No Change
Lowest Performing 24.4 17.8 -6.6 19.6 454Exceeded Target
High needs 15.7 15.7 0.0 13.4 3051No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.6 18.5 -0.1 14.0 1682Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 12.1 12.7 0.6 8.5 1500Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 34--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 38--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.5 11.5 0.0 10.1 5981No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 66.3 63.3 -3.0 70.7 3300Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 57.4 56.2 -1.2 64.5 1300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.5 56.7 -5.8 70.2 900Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 46.3 51.6 5.3 53.7 622Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 67.5 66.4 -1.1 72.5 2800Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles