We're working on improvements to School and District Profiles and other DESE Reports. We'd love your input!
Take our quick survey to tell us what information matters most to you. Your feedback will help shape the new and improved Profiles.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Tantasqua Regional Sr High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Tantasqua Regional Sr High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Tantasqua (07700000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
60% - Substantial progress toward targets79

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%59%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
60%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage59%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage61%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage-47%
Weight0%100%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
47%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage-

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
67

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.3 0.2 100.0 1764Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.5 98.1 0.6 99.5 394Exceeded Target
High needs 95.1 96.3 1.2 97.0 343Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.2 95.7 1.5 96.4 293Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.2 0.1 100.0 1554Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.1 96.6 -0.5 98.8 1741No Change
Lowest Performing 92.5 93.6 1.1 95.2 392Improved Below Target
High needs 87.1 84.4 -2.7 89.4 320Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.0 88.4 -4.6 95.8 280Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.9 97.2 0.3 98.6 1533Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.2 96.7 0.5 97.9 1533Met Target
Lowest Performing 90.0 88.5 -1.5 93.5 391No Change
High needs 86.7 89.6 2.9 89.3 243Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 88.0 91.3 3.3 90.8 203Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.2 96.4 0.2 98.1 1383Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 56.9 1693Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 43.8 382Typical Growth - Low
High needs 42.0 312Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.9 262Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 3--
Hispanic/Latino- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 57.7 1493Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 49.6 1672Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 31.6 381Low Growth
High needs 46.1 292Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.8 252Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities- 5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 3--
Hispanic/Latino- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 49.1 1472Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 94.8 98.9 4.1 96.6 1744Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.1 95.7 10.6 88.5 474Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 82.1 97.4 15.3 86.6 394Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.7 98.8 4.1 96.5 1654Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.4 97.6 0.2 99.1 2113Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.7 92.5 1.8 94.6 672Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.7 91.1 -0.6 96.0 560Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 97.9 0.2 99.5 1893Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.9 0.4 -0.5 1.0 7204Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.6 2.3 0.7 1.4 1330Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.1 3.0 0.9 1.9 1010Declined
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 43--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 36--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.9 0.5 -0.4 1.0 6564Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.2 12.7 1.5 9.9 7250Declined
Lowest Performing 12.0 12.8 0.8 7.2 390Declined
High needs 27.0 30.7 3.7 24.7 1530Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.2 30.8 -0.4 26.6 1172Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 11--
Students w/ disabilities---- 38--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 41--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 21--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 11.2 12.8 1.6 9.8 6430Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.9 78.7 -2.2 85.3 3620Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 56.0 39.4 -16.6 63.1 660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 60.7 43.6 -17.1 68.4 550Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.4 79.9 -0.5 85.4 3231No Change


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles