Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Gateway Regional High

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Gateway Regional High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Gateway (06720000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
West/Central
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Substantial progress toward targets

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage25%76%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
56%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage76%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage25%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage21%-
Weight--
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
-
-
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage- Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage21%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.5 98.6 3.1 97.3 534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 91.7 96.3 4.6 94.5 204Exceeded Target
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 98.4 3.1 97.0 484Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.0 94.8 6.8 90.6 534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 81.0 86.3 5.3 84.8 204Exceeded Target
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.5 94.8 7.3 89.3 484Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 88.8 92.5 3.7 91.3 533Met Target
Lowest Performing 81.0 80.0 -1.0 83.6 201No Change
High needs---- 19--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 12--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 88.3 92.7 4.4 91.0 484Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 61.2 494Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 11--
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 62.1 454Exceeded Typical Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 56.3 493Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing- 19--
High needs- 16--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 11--
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities- 4--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black----
Hispanic/Latino- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 55.4 453Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 88.1 84.8 -3.3 91.1 460Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 20--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.1 84.4 -4.7 92.1 450Declined

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 89.9 91.5 1.6 93.1 592Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 27--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 24--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.6 90.9 1.3 92.5 552Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 3.2 3.3 0.1 2.9 2121No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 81--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 61--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 3.4 3.6 0.2 3.1 1970Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 13.6 8.9 -4.7 10.6 2034Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 204Exceeded Target
High needs---- 78--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities---- 31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 13.6 9.6 -4.0 10.0 1883Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.7 72.0 7.3 70.4 1004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs---- 37--
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 65.8 71.3 5.5 71.2 943Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles