Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Dighton-Rehoboth (06500000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
PK,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Substantial progress toward targets

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage58%84%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
74%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage58%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage49%73%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
64%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage73% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage49%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 99.6 1.8 99.2 2044Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 93.5 99.0 5.5 95.5 514Exceeded Target
High needs 92.2 96.7 4.5 94.1 234Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 99.6 1.9 99.2 1934Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 92.7 97.0 4.3 94.4 2014Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 77.2 90.0 12.8 79.9 504Exceeded Target
High needs 78.6 82.1 3.5 80.9 213Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 13--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 92.6 97.5 4.9 94.3 1904Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.2 96.6 5.4 92.9 1994Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 73.4 87.7 14.3 76.9 514Exceeded Target
High needs 76.1 84.5 8.4 78.7 214Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 14--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.1 96.8 5.7 93.0 1884Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 55.0 1933Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 35.3 491Low Growth
High needs- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 13--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 55.2 1823Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 55.1 1933Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 43.0 492Typical Growth - Low
High needs- 17--
Econ. Disadvantaged- 13--
EL and Former EL----
Students w/ disabilities- 7--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian----
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 55.0 1823Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.8 92.4 -1.4 95.6 2110Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 85.9 73.3 -12.6 89.3 600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 49--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.7 93.2 -0.5 95.5 1901No Change

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.2 96.9 -0.3 98.9 2253Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.4 92.9 -1.5 98.3 850Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 70--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 35--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 97.1 -0.9 99.8 2073Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 1.7 0.5 -1.2 1.5 8264Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 6.3 1.7 -4.6 5.7 1774Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 113--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 102--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 33--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 1.6 0.4 -1.2 1.4 7594Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.5 16.8 2.3 13.2 8190Declined
Lowest Performing 17.4 9.8 -7.6 12.6 514Exceeded Target
High needs 27.2 28.8 1.6 24.9 1630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 93--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 63--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 7--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 33--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 14.6 16.6 2.0 13.2 7530Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 67.1 61.9 -5.2 71.5 3830Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 40.2 36.4 -3.8 47.3 880Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 49--
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities---- 49--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 66.8 62.9 -3.9 71.8 3500Declined


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles