Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Concord Carlisle High

District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Concord Carlisle High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Concord-Carlisle (06400000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:Meeting or exceeding targets

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%92%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
84%
Meeting or exceeding targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage92%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage71%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%73%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
68%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage73% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage61%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
96

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.8 99.7 -0.1 100.0 3004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 100.0 98.6 -1.4 100.0 714Exceeded Target
High needs 99.3 98.3 -1.0 100.0 604Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 99.2 97.7 -1.5 100.0 444Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 98.1 -1.9 100.0 264Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 99.9 0.1 100.0 2394Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 98.8 1.8 98.6 3004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 91.2 94.8 3.6 93.3 724Exceeded Target
High needs 89.8 94.2 4.4 91.8 604Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 88.3 92.0 3.7 90.9 443Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 98.1 -1.9 100.0 264Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.9 99.2 1.3 99.5 2394Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.6 99.4 0.8 100.0 2904Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 94.5 97.5 3.0 96.8 714Exceeded Target
High needs 94.8 97.0 2.2 97.4 593Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 93.8 96.0 2.2 96.3 443Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.8 0.7 100.0 2334Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 55.8 2673Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 42.2 622Typical Growth - Low
High needs 49.3 512Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged- 18--
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 49.5 372Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 53.7 223Typical Growth - High
Afr. Amer./Black- 13--
Hispanic/Latino- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 56.2 2123Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 62.6 2664Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing 58.3 633Typical Growth - High
High needs 63.2 514Exceeded Typical Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged- 18--
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 61.0 374Exceeded Typical Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 65.2 224Exceeded Typical Growth
Afr. Amer./Black- 13--
Hispanic/Latino- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 62.4 2114Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.8 98.4 0.6 98.9 3224Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.8 94.7 0.9 97.0 762Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 28--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 91.9 94.5 2.6 95.8 552Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 93.5 93.1 -0.4 96.0 291No Change
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 98.8 0.8 99.4 2534Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.3 99.4 0.1 100.0 3124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.6 97.5 0.9 99.2 813Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 25--
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 95.7 96.8 1.1 99.2 623Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 100.0 96.8 -3.2 100.0 313Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 99.6 0.0 100.0 2534Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.3 0.2 1.0 1,2733Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.4 1.5 1.1 1.0 2650Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 76--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 0.5 1.4 0.9 1.0 2100Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 0.0 1.8 1.8 1.0 1130Declined
Afr. Amer./Black---- 52--
Hispanic/Latino---- 57--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 49--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 1,0023Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 9.4 11.5 2.1 8.3 1,2810Declined
Lowest Performing 16.4 9.7 -6.7 12.4 724Exceeded Target
High needs 19.9 20.5 0.6 16.8 2680Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 66--
EL and Former EL---- 29--
Students w/ disabilities 22.3 24.2 1.9 18.4 1980Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 6.1 7.2 1.1 4.2 1113Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 54--
Hispanic/Latino---- 60--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 62--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 10.0 11.4 1.4 8.6 9930Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 82.7 84.6 1.9 85.4 6413Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 58.9 59.6 0.7 65.5 1462Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 51.9 55.6 3.7 59.1 1172Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 92.1 93.3 1.2 95.3 604Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 26--
Hispanic/Latino---- 27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 30--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.6 84.9 1.3 86.4 4983Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles