Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Swampscott High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Swampscott High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Swampscott (02910000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
38% - Moderate progress toward targets59.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57%25%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
38%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage57%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%20%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
40%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage20% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
53

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.5 98.2 -1.3 100.0 1784Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 98.1 93.6 -4.5 100.0 430Declined
High needs 98.4 93.8 -4.6 100.0 520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 99.2 93.1 -6.1 100.0 290Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 96.6 90.2 -6.4 98.5 280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 98.1 96.4 -1.7 100.0 211No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.8 98.6 -1.2 100.0 1424Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.6 94.0 -2.6 98.3 1780Declined
Lowest Performing 90.6 77.3 -13.3 93.3 430Declined
High needs 92.7 80.8 -11.9 95.0 520Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 96.7 83.6 -13.1 99.5 290Declined
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 87.0 67.0 -20.0 89.6 280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 96.3 82.1 -14.2 99.5 210Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.1 95.4 -1.7 98.8 1421No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 97.7 94.9 -2.8 99.4 1730Declined
Lowest Performing 91.9 83.3 -8.6 95.4 420Declined
High needs 95.3 83.3 -12.0 97.9 480Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.2 87.5 -7.7 98.0 240Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 95.2 73.1 -22.1 97.9 270Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.3 96.2 -2.1 100.0 1391No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 49.5 1662Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 25.0 410Very Low Growth
High needs 33.7 461Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.8 251Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 24.4 250Very Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 9--
Hispanic/Latino- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 52.0 1333Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 46.2 1662Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 27.2 410Very Low Growth
High needs 35.9 461Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.8 251Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 29.4 250Very Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black- 9--
Hispanic/Latino- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 46.4 1332Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.7 95.7 -1.0 98.5 1623Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 91.5 94.2 2.7 94.9 522Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.9 90.6 -0.3 95.4 321No Change
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 95.5 92.9 -2.6 100.0 280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.7 96.3 -2.4 100.0 1343Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 96.7 -0.3 98.7 1843Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.7 91.5 -5.2 100.0 590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 97.7 90.9 -6.8 100.0 440Declined
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 93.9 95.5 1.6 99.0 223Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 96.7 98.7 2.0 98.5 1563Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.4 0.1 -0.3 1.0 6734Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 1.3 0.0 -1.3 1.2 1704Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.1 0.0 -1.1 1.0 1034Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 1.2 0.0 -1.2 1.1 854Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 33--
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 730Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.2 0.0 -0.2 1.0 5384Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 18.9 18.4 -0.5 17.6 7162Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 22.5 23.3 0.8 17.7 430Declined
High needs 23.0 26.0 3.0 20.7 2190Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 30.8 30.7 -0.1 26.2 1142Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 32--
Students w/ disabilities 20.8 30.7 9.9 17.2 1010Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 34--
Hispanic/Latino 28.2 18.7 -9.5 24.4 914Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 13--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 17.4 19.0 1.6 16.0 5580Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 63.6 75.2 11.6 68.0 3354Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 33.3 62.4 29.1 40.4 1014Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.5 63.6 26.1 45.2 664Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities 18.2 52.1 33.9 25.6 484Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 16--
Hispanic/Latino 41.7 53.8 12.1 48.2 394Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 66.5 76.7 10.2 71.5 2624Exceeded Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles