Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Roger L. Putnam Vocational Technical Academy
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Springfield (02810000)		TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
West/Central		GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Moderate progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
39% - Moderate progress toward targets17

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage60%25%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		39%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage25%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage60%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage67%29%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		44%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage29% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage67%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
26

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.1 93.8 -1.3 96.9 3381No Change
Lowest Performing 81.8 74.7 -7.1 84.6 810Declined
High needs 93.9 92.6 -1.3 96.4 2711No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.2 92.2 -2.0 96.3 2481No Change
EL and Former EL 90.7 89.7 -1.0 94.2 681No Change
Students w/ disabilities 82.1 80.6 -1.5 85.2 581No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 93.8 93.4 -0.4 96.7 641No Change
Hispanic/Latino 95.2 93.2 -2.0 97.4 2421No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.9 99.0 3.1 97.6 264Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.6 77.3 -0.3 80.2 3371No Change
Lowest Performing 36.1 38.0 1.9 39.9 812Improved Below Target
High needs 75.1 74.3 -0.8 77.5 2691No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 75.2 74.8 -0.4 77.7 2461No Change
EL and Former EL 63.7 68.8 5.1 69.2 683Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 51.6 48.3 -3.3 55.5 580Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 78.1 79.6 1.5 82.4 652Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 76.7 75.1 -1.6 79.7 2411No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.5 87.0 5.5 83.3 254Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 73.4 71.6 -1.8 75.9 3241No Change
Lowest Performing 48.6 43.6 -5.0 51.2 820Declined
High needs 70.6 69.6 -1.0 73.1 2601No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 70.7 69.6 -1.1 73.4 2381No Change
EL and Former EL 60.5 67.0 6.5 64.4 664Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 54.5 51.3 -3.2 57.7 560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 75.4 73.8 -1.6 78.4 641No Change
Hispanic/Latino 71.2 70.4 -0.8 74.8 2281No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 80.2 71.2 -9.0 82.9 260Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 36.8 3261Low Growth
Lowest Performing 19.3 760Very Low Growth
High needs 35.8 2621Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 36.2 2411Low Growth
EL and Former EL 36.4 601Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 28.2 570Very Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 33.9 631Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 36.8 2331Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 35.6 241Low Growth

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 34.2 3241Low Growth
Lowest Performing 23.7 760Very Low Growth
High needs 33.3 2591Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.4 2381Low Growth
EL and Former EL 36.3 591Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 30.5 571Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black 37.0 641Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 33.0 2311Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 38.5 231Low Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.3 95.8 0.5 98.3 3553Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 95.0 94.6 -0.4 98.8 2801No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.9 94.8 -0.1 99.2 2711No Change
EL and Former EL 86.5 93.9 7.4 93.9 493Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 88.7 85.7 -3.0 96.8 490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black 97.1 94.6 -2.5 100.0 920Declined
Hispanic/Latino 93.9 95.1 1.2 98.9 2063Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 484Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 93.6 95.6 2.0 96.8 3423Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.4 95.3 1.9 97.9 3173Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.7 95.2 1.5 98.3 3113Met Target
EL and Former EL 87.2 86.5 -0.7 92.9 520Declined
Students w/ disabilities 81.0 88.7 7.7 87.2 624Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black 95.3 97.1 1.8 100.0 693Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 93.0 94.3 1.3 98.8 2282Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.6 100.0 5.4 97.5 354Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.7 1.3 0.6 1.0 1,4360Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.0 1,0740Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.7 1.6 0.9 1.0 9930Declined
EL and Former EL 2.1 3.3 1.2 1.9 1510Declined
Students w/ disabilities 1.8 3.2 1.4 1.6 2200Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 20--
Afr. Amer./Black 0.4 0.7 0.3 1.0 2833Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.0 9600Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.6 1.2 0.6 1.0 1620Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 30.6 19.9 -10.7 32.1 1610Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 30.6 19.9 -10.7 32.1 1610Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 15.7 10.0 -5.7 12.7 1,4154Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 26.1 18.3 -7.8 19.2 824Exceeded Target
High needs 17.8 12.0 -5.8 14.2 1,1294Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.1 12.4 -5.7 14.1 9714Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 19.3 11.2 -8.1 14.9 3214Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 20.5 12.6 -7.9 16.7 2224Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 19--
Afr. Amer./Black 10.1 4.7 -5.4 6.4 2544Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 17.3 11.6 -5.7 13.4 9954Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 16.3 8.7 -7.6 12.7 1384Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 48.1 45.3 -2.8 53.8 6660Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 42.9 40.6 -2.3 48.5 5170Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 45.1 40.7 -4.4 50.8 4990Declined
EL and Former EL 27.0 31.9 4.9 32.6 1443Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 9.8 19.4 9.6 15.7 934Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black 60.0 49.1 -10.9 66.5 1100Declined
Hispanic/Latino 43.0 42.8 -0.2 50.5 4671No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 52.4 54.7 2.3 57.8 752Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles