Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Medfield Senior High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Medfield Senior High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Medfield (01750000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Meeting or exceeding targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
87% - Meeting or exceeding targets97.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage87%88%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
87%
Meeting or exceeding targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage88%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage87%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%54%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
63%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage54% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage77%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
92

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 99.6 0.2 100.0 1974Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 99.5 98.5 -1.0 100.0 494Exceeded Target
High needs 96.4 97.5 1.1 98.3 304Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.6 99.6 0.0 100.0 1734Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.9 99.1 0.2 100.0 1974Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.2 96.4 0.2 98.3 493Met Target
High needs 94.3 95.0 0.7 96.3 303Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 17--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.5 99.3 -0.2 100.0 1734Exceeded Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.8 97.9 -0.9 100.0 1944Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.6 92.9 -3.7 98.9 493Met Target
High needs 94.7 89.3 -5.4 97.3 280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 15--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities---- 18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 9--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 2--
Hispanic/Latino---- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.2 98.2 -1.0 100.0 1704Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.6 1883Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 35.6 471Low Growth
High needs 38.5 281Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged- 17--
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 52.7 1673Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 69.8 1874Exceeded Typical Growth
Lowest Performing 65.7 474Exceeded Typical Growth
High needs 63.1 284Exceeded Typical Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged- 17--
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities- 17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black- 2--
Hispanic/Latino- 5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 71.2 1664Exceeded Typical Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.6 98.3 -0.3 99.7 2303Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.6 90.0 -3.6 96.8 400Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 16--
EL and Former EL---- 4--
Students w/ disabilities---- 28--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 99.0 98.0 -1.0 100.0 2003Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.7 98.6 -0.1 99.7 2193Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.2 93.6 0.4 95.8 472Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities---- 31--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.6 99.0 0.4 99.8 1933Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.1 0.0 -0.1 1.0 8284Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.9 0.0 -0.9 1.0 1254Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 51--
EL and Former EL---- 9--
Students w/ disabilities---- 79--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 49--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 2--
White 0.1 0.0 -0.1 1.0 7264Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 5.2 5.3 0.1 4.1 8004Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 7.7 2.0 -5.7 3.7 494Exceeded Target
High needs 11.5 11.8 0.3 8.4 1191No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 39--
EL and Former EL---- 10--
Students w/ disabilities---- 78--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 45--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 23--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 5.2 5.1 -0.1 3.8 7074Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 90.7 90.1 -0.6 93.4 3954Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 61.7 58.2 -3.5 68.3 550Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities---- 37--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 25--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 91.0 90.3 -0.7 93.8 3514Exceeded Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles