Massachusetts School and District Profiles

B M C Durfee High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - B M C Durfee High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Fall River (00950000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools

Low subgroup performance: White -Students w/disabilities -High needs
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
20% - Limited or no progress toward targets7.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage23%18%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
20%
Limited or no progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage18%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage23%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage27%33%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
30%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage33% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage27%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
5

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 91.8 90.2 -1.6 93.6 4751No Change
Lowest Performing 78.2 67.8 -10.4 81.0 1000Declined
High needs 88.4 86.7 -1.7 90.9 3371No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 90.0 87.1 -2.9 92.1 3060Declined
EL and Former EL 75.3 75.6 0.3 78.8 882Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 76.8 67.3 -9.5 79.9 810Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 96.4 100.0 3.6 98.3 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 91.4 92.4 1.0 94.3 432Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 85.6 81.3 -4.3 87.8 1200Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.3 92.7 -0.6 95.0 2661No Change

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 77.6 75.2 -2.4 80.2 4761No Change
Lowest Performing 39.8 34.8 -5.0 43.6 990Declined
High needs 70.6 69.5 -1.1 73.0 3391No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 72.7 70.1 -2.6 75.2 3080Declined
EL and Former EL 55.5 56.0 0.5 61.0 882Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 49.1 47.3 -1.8 53.0 821No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 87.5 92.9 5.4 90.8 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 64.8 66.1 1.3 69.1 422Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino 67.3 65.6 -1.7 70.3 1221No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.3 79.4 -1.9 83.1 2651No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 80.3 78.5 -1.8 82.8 4231No Change
Lowest Performing 56.3 37.6 -18.7 58.9 990Declined
High needs 74.4 72.1 -2.3 76.9 2951No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 76.2 73.8 -2.4 78.9 2681No Change
EL and Former EL 57.3 61.3 4.0 61.2 713Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 58.3 43.0 -15.3 61.5 750Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 79.0 96.4 17.4 81.9 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 71.9 75.0 3.1 74.9 303Met Target
Hispanic/Latino 72.5 68.2 -4.3 76.1 990Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.9 80.8 -3.1 86.6 2500Declined

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 40.3 3972Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 22.1 860Very Low Growth
High needs 37.5 2751Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.4 2541Low Growth
EL and Former EL 35.3 521Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 25.1 620Very Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 52.5 253Typical Growth - High
Afr. Amer./Black 34.9 351Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 36.5 951Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 16--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 41.2 2262Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 32.7 3961Low Growth
Lowest Performing 22.0 840Very Low Growth
High needs 29.6 2740Very Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 29.6 2530Very Low Growth
EL and Former EL 31.0 511Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 24.5 620Very Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 43.2 252Typical Growth - Low
Afr. Amer./Black 30.5 341Low Growth
Hispanic/Latino 30.4 961Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 32.8 2241Low Growth

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 80.7 83.1 2.4 83.7 5262Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 77.1 78.4 1.3 80.9 3892Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.2 80.8 3.6 81.5 3542Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 64.4 63.8 -0.6 71.8 690Declined
Students w/ disabilities 47.6 49.0 1.4 55.7 1022Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 96.6 100.0 3.4 100.0 244Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 78.8 76.6 -2.2 85.1 470Declined
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 74.3 1.9 77.4 1092Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 82.1 85.0 2.9 85.1 3263Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 80.5 82.1 1.6 83.7 5492Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 76.9 79.0 2.1 81.4 4332Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 77.1 78.8 1.7 81.7 4162Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 60.0 67.8 7.8 65.7 594Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 53.6 54.3 0.7 59.8 1052Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 87.5 96.6 9.1 92.8 294Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 84.6 82.7 -1.9 89.3 520Declined
Hispanic/Latino 67.0 73.2 6.2 72.8 1233Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 83.6 83.6 0.0 86.5 3241No Change

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 2.3 2.3 0.0 2.1 2,1121No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.9 2.9 0.0 2.6 1,4041No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.0 2.2 0.2 1.8 1,2250Declined
EL and Former EL 5.7 4.9 -0.8 5.1 2633Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 5.4 4.9 -0.5 4.9 3893Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1133Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black 2.3 0.0 -2.3 2.1 1724Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 3.6 2.6 -1.0 3.2 5014Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 92--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 2.0 2.8 0.8 1.8 1,2260Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 25.4 19.3 -6.1 26.9 2230Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 25.4 19.3 -6.1 26.9 2230Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.9 34.9 -4.0 35.9 2,1274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 43.8 48.0 4.2 36.9 1000Declined
High needs 45.4 41.2 -4.2 41.8 1,5424Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 46.8 43.2 -3.6 42.8 1,2813Met Target
EL and Former EL 46.1 41.7 -4.4 41.7 4483Met Target
Students w/ disabilities 42.9 40.4 -2.5 39.1 2722Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian 20.4 17.7 -2.7 16.0 1132Improved Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black 40.1 35.3 -4.8 36.4 1844Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 44.8 41.5 -3.3 40.9 5472Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 101--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 38.2 33.3 -4.9 34.6 1,1744Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 38.9 58.1 19.2 44.6 9534Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 26.2 50.3 24.1 31.8 6524Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.7 52.8 25.1 33.4 5974Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 17.9 44.6 26.7 23.5 1774Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 2.0 17.2 15.2 7.9 1574Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian 58.8 72.2 13.4 65.0 544Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black 30.3 47.1 16.8 36.8 704Exceeded Target
Hispanic/Latino 21.1 49.1 28.0 28.6 2324Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 42--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 45.1 61.0 15.9 50.5 5494Exceeded Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles