Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Shawsheen Valley Vocational Technical High School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Shawsheen Valley Vocational Technical High School

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Shawsheen Valley Regional Vocational Technical (08710000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
56% - Substantial progress toward targets81.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage66%49%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
56%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage49%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage66%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57%71%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
65%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage71% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage57%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
93

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.0 99.3 0.3 100.0 3194Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.7 97.8 1.1 98.3 804Exceeded Target
High needs 97.6 98.1 0.5 99.5 1184Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.8 98.5 -0.3 100.0 494Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 96.3 97.4 1.1 98.4 883Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.4 0.3 100.0 2914Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.2 92.8 -0.4 94.8 3181No Change
Lowest Performing 78.6 74.4 -4.2 80.7 800Declined
High needs 84.8 85.0 0.2 86.8 1182Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.4 89.5 -2.9 94.7 500Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 77.5 80.4 2.9 80.1 883Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 93.7 93.6 -0.1 95.3 2901No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.6 93.2 -1.4 96.3 3141No Change
Lowest Performing 82.8 77.5 -5.3 85.1 810Declined
High needs 87.5 87.8 0.3 90.1 1172Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.1 89.3 -4.8 96.1 490Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 80.8 84.8 4.0 83.3 874Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.9 93.7 -1.2 96.6 2861No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 57.1 3013Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 42.5 742Typical Growth - Low
High needs 54.7 1093Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.3 443Typical Growth - High
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 54.1 833Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 57.5 2753Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 52.4 3013Typical Growth - High
Lowest Performing 44.9 752Typical Growth - Low
High needs 50.5 1103Typical Growth - High
Econ. Disadvantaged 47.6 462Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 51.2 843Typical Growth - High
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 1--
Hispanic/Latino- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 53.1 2753Typical Growth - High

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 98.8 1.8 98.1 3354Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.8 97.7 3.9 97.0 1284Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.3 97.1 1.8 98.9 683Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 91.8 96.4 4.6 95.7 834Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 4--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 98.7 2.0 98.1 3104Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 99.4 98.8 -0.6 100.0 3323Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 99.3 97.9 -1.4 100.0 1443Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.9 98.8 -0.1 100.0 853Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 98.9 97.6 -1.3 100.0 853Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 16--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.7 98.7 -1.0 100.0 3023Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 1,3263Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.0 4733Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2013Met Target
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.6 0.3 -0.3 1.0 3304Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 62--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.0 1,2083Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.9 6.7 -0.2 5.8 1,2983Met Target
Lowest Performing 8.4 9.9 1.5 4.4 810Declined
High needs 12.1 11.3 -0.8 9.0 4532Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.5 12.3 -3.2 11.3 1872Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 9.6 10.1 0.5 5.7 2961No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 15--
Hispanic/Latino---- 64--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 26--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 7.0 6.9 -0.1 5.6 1,1753Met Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 69.8 70.4 0.6 72.5 6222Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 59.8 60.3 0.5 66.4 2092Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 62.4 60.4 -2.0 70.1 1110Declined
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 55.1 53.6 -1.5 62.3 1250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 6--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino---- 28--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 70.6 70.0 -0.6 73.4 5671No Change


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles