Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Attleboro High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2019
View Next Year
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - North Attleboro High
Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Attleborough (02120000)		TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal		GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
64% - Substantial progress toward targets67.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage54%71%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		64%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage71%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage54%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage36%70%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)		56%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage70% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage36%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
61

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.5 0.4 100.0 2404Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 97.2 98.7 1.5 99.2 594Exceeded Target
High needs 96.5 97.6 1.1 98.4 534Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 98.3 96.8 -1.5 100.0 391No Change
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 93.2 95.0 1.8 95.1 253Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.6 0.5 100.0 1994Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 94.9 96.7 1.8 96.6 2413Met Target
Lowest Performing 84.0 88.6 4.6 86.7 594Exceeded Target
High needs 83.2 88.0 4.8 85.5 544Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.8 85.3 -0.5 88.6 391No Change
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 75.0 79.8 4.8 77.6 264Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.3 96.9 2.6 96.0 2003Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.7 96.1 0.4 97.4 2362Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 85.3 86.4 1.1 88.8 592Improved Below Target
High needs 85.9 87.7 1.8 88.5 533Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 91.0 88.2 -2.8 93.8 380Declined
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 76.5 80.4 3.9 79.2 283Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 15--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.3 96.3 1.0 97.2 1983Met Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 47.1 2262Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 33.5 571Low Growth
High needs 42.0 482Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 42.2 362Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 41.6 212Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black- 7--
Hispanic/Latino- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 46.7 1882Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 47.4 2282Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 43.3 582Typical Growth - Low
High needs 44.7 502Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.9 362Typical Growth - Low
EL and Former EL- 1--
Students w/ disabilities 44.9 232Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian- 14--
Afr. Amer./Black- 7--
Hispanic/Latino- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 47.3 1902Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 95.0 95.9 0.9 96.8 3143Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 87.4 84.7 -2.7 90.8 720Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 85.1 91.3 6.2 89.6 464Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 80.0 77.8 -2.2 85.7 360Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 16--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino---- 20--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 94.8 96.5 1.7 96.6 2603Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 97.0 97.1 0.1 98.7 2783Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 93.7 94.3 0.6 97.6 872Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 93.4 92.5 -0.9 97.7 670Declined
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 86.1 92.5 6.4 91.2 404Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 12--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.7 96.8 -0.9 99.5 2503Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.8 0.3 -0.5 1.0 1,1564Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 2.4 1.0 -1.4 2.2 2864Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.1 1.1 -1.0 1.9 1744Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities 1.5 1.3 -0.2 1.4 1553Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 71--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 36--
Hispanic/Latino---- 64--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 29--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 0.6 0.2 -0.4 1.0 9514Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.3 11.6 0.3 10.0 1,1301No Change
Lowest Performing 14.1 18.6 4.5 9.3 590Declined
High needs 23.1 28.1 5.0 20.8 3020Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 28.5 34.4 5.9 23.9 1510Declined
EL and Former EL---- 49--
Students w/ disabilities 26.7 28.9 2.2 23.1 1520Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 77--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 41--
Hispanic/Latino---- 57--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 34--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 11.9 11.5 -0.4 10.5 9172Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 59.1 61.3 2.2 63.5 5842Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 22.1 26.8 4.7 29.2 1572Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 29.8 33.0 3.2 37.5 912Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 26--
Students w/ disabilities 7.4 9.3 1.9 14.8 862Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 38--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 18--
Hispanic/Latino---- 29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 59.5 61.5 2.0 64.5 4812Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles