Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Andover High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - North Andover High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
North Andover (02110000)
TITLE I STATUS
Non-Title I School
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Substantial progress toward targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
50% - Substantial progress toward targets58.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage40%57%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
50%
Substantial progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage57%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage40%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage30%48%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
41%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage48% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage30%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
44

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 98.5 97.7 -0.8 99.9 3654Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 95.4 95.7 0.3 97.4 872Improved Below Target
High needs 92.9 90.1 -2.8 94.8 860Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 94.9 94.1 -0.8 97.1 511No Change
EL and Former EL---- 8--
Students w/ disabilities 90.3 82.0 -8.3 92.2 430Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 97.9 100.0 2.1 100.0 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 97.3 90.2 -7.1 99.2 330Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.7 98.3 -0.4 100.0 2894Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.2 94.1 -1.1 96.9 3621No Change
Lowest Performing 83.2 83.6 0.4 85.9 872Improved Below Target
High needs 80.6 78.9 -1.7 82.9 841No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.0 85.7 -3.3 91.8 490Declined
EL and Former EL---- 7--
Students w/ disabilities 68.5 66.1 -2.4 71.1 421No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 96.9 100.0 3.1 98.9 284Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 9--
Hispanic/Latino 89.7 78.1 -11.6 92.9 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.6 95.5 -0.1 97.3 2871No Change

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.3 96.5 0.2 98.0 3473Met Target
Lowest Performing 87.2 87.9 0.7 90.7 872Improved Below Target
High needs 86.6 88.2 1.6 89.2 743Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.7 88.6 -7.1 98.5 440Declined
EL and Former EL---- 6--
Students w/ disabilities 78.2 83.1 4.9 80.9 374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 94.0 98.1 4.1 96.0 274Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 91.3 87.5 -3.8 94.4 320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 97.0 97.6 0.6 98.9 2764Exceeded Target

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 45.1 3302Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 31.8 811Low Growth
High needs 38.4 701Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.4 431Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 4--
Students w/ disabilities 34.4 351Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 49.0 262Typical Growth - Low
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 39.8 281Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 45.8 2652Typical Growth - Low

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 41.7 3262Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 34.7 801Low Growth
High needs 41.2 682Typical Growth - Low
Econ. Disadvantaged 37.8 421Low Growth
EL and Former EL- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 42.7 332Typical Growth - Low
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.----
Asian 50.0 263Typical Growth - High
Afr. Amer./Black- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 37.0 261Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 41.8 2632Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 96.9 96.8 -0.1 98.7 3783Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 90.8 96.6 5.8 94.2 1194Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 89.2 96.7 7.5 93.7 604Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 85.7 95.9 10.2 91.4 734Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian 100.0 96.6 -3.4 100.0 293Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 13--
Hispanic/Latino 87.0 96.2 9.2 88.8 264Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 98.4 97.7 -0.7 100.0 3023Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.2 98.5 0.3 99.9 3243Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 96.6 95.9 -0.7 100.0 983Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 95.5 95.4 -0.1 99.8 653Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 3--
Students w/ disabilities 97.1 94.6 -2.5 100.0 560Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian 91.7 100.0 8.3 93.4 244Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 11--
Hispanic/Latino 95.2 95.7 0.5 96.9 233Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 3--
White 98.9 98.8 -0.1 100.0 2533Met Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 1,4903Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.0 3153Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1820Declined
EL and Former EL---- 14--
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 1720Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1014Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 46--
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 1323Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 19--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 6--
White 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 1,1833Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 11.3 11.4 0.1 10.0 1,4771No Change
Lowest Performing 19.5 11.5 -8.0 14.7 874Exceeded Target
High needs 24.7 22.8 -1.9 22.4 3423Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 27.6 30.1 2.5 23.0 1860Declined
EL and Former EL---- 33--
Students w/ disabilities 23.7 21.6 -2.1 20.1 1622Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 3.0 6.8 3.8 0.0 1033Met Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 57--
Hispanic/Latino 21.5 26.6 5.1 17.7 1430Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 22--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 10.6 9.9 -0.7 9.2 1,1472Improved Below Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 64.5 70.8 6.3 68.9 7274Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 28.7 33.8 5.1 35.8 1452Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 33.6 42.1 8.5 41.3 953Met Target
EL and Former EL---- 13--
Students w/ disabilities 15.5 17.2 1.7 22.9 642Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian 81.6 88.9 7.3 86.8 454Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black---- 23--
Hispanic/Latino 30.8 47.8 17.0 37.3 694Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 4--
White 67.4 72.4 5.0 72.4 5773Met Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles