Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Holyoke High

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2019 Official Accountability Report - Holyoke High

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Holyoke (01370000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I School
REGION
Strategic Transformation
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationRequiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support
Among the lowest performing 10% of schools

Low subgroup performance: Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -High needs

Low participation rate: Students w/disabilities -Economically disadvantaged -Hispanic/Latino -EL and former EL -High needs -All students
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
25% - Moderate progress toward targets2.00

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage47%10%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
25%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total------
Percentage of possible points ----
Criterion-referenced target percentage10%
Weighted total------ Percentage of possible points ---- Criterion-referenced target percentage47%

Overall progress toward improvement targets

 20182019
Annual criterion-referenced target percentage55%17%
Weight40%60%
Cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage
(2018 x 40%) + (2019 x 60%)
32%
Moderate progress toward targets
Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2019 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage17% Weighted total--- Percentage of possible points -- 2018 Annual criterion-referenced target percentage55%

Subgroup percentile

This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools serving similar grades
3

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 93.6 88.7 -4.9 95.4 3530Declined
Lowest Performing 81.0 60.5 -20.5 83.8 740Declined
High needs 91.3 86.0 -5.3 93.8 2780Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 92.7 86.2 -6.5 94.8 2590Declined
EL and Former EL 81.9 75.9 -6.0 85.4 1080Declined
Students w/ disabilities 74.3 70.1 -4.2 77.4 710Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 92.8 86.1 -6.7 95.0 2760Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.4 98.5 2.1 98.1 674Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 78.5 69.3 -9.2 81.1 3440Declined
Lowest Performing 38.6 26.4 -12.2 42.4 710Declined
High needs 73.7 64.2 -9.5 76.1 2690Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 74.7 63.8 -10.9 77.2 2510Declined
EL and Former EL 61.1 52.4 -8.7 66.6 1060Declined
Students w/ disabilities 48.0 50.4 2.4 51.9 672Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 75.7 64.5 -11.2 78.7 2690Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 87.8 89.6 1.8 89.6 653Met Target

Science achievement - MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2018 Achievement 2019 Achievement Change 2019 Target N Points Reason
All Students 76.5 66.2 -10.3 79.0 3370Declined
Lowest Performing 44.0 27.8 -16.2 46.6 720Declined
High needs 71.2 61.0 -10.2 73.7 2630Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 72.7 61.5 -11.2 75.4 2460Declined
EL and Former EL 58.2 47.0 -11.2 62.1 1000Declined
Students w/ disabilities 53.7 52.2 -1.5 56.9 691No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 6--
Hispanic/Latino 72.4 61.3 -11.1 76.0 2630Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 89.3 87.5 -1.8 92.0 621No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 40.3 2752Typical Growth - Low
Lowest Performing 25.1 640Very Low Growth
High needs 38.6 2201Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 38.5 2031Low Growth
EL and Former EL 32.3 791Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 39.4 491Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 38.7 2281Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 54.8 373Typical Growth - High

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2019 Mean SGP N Points Reason
All Students 34.5 2651Low Growth
Lowest Performing 21.2 620Very Low Growth
High needs 33.7 2111Low Growth
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.5 1951Low Growth
EL and Former EL 34.7 771Low Growth
Students w/ disabilities 38.0 461Low Growth
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.- 1--
Asian- 2--
Afr. Amer./Black- 5--
Hispanic/Latino 33.2 2201Low Growth
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.----
White 44.6 352Typical Growth - Low

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 75.4 74.1 -1.3 78.4 3440Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 69.5 68.3 -1.2 73.3 2590Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 69.6 68.2 -1.4 73.9 2450Declined
EL and Former EL 40.0 55.6 15.6 47.4 634Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities 32.6 44.1 11.5 40.7 684Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 10--
Hispanic/Latino 73.2 68.5 -4.7 78.2 2320Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.3 86.8 3.5 86.3 913Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 73.2 81.8 8.6 76.4 2854Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 68.8 77.4 8.6 73.3 2264Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 69.5 77.7 8.2 74.1 2244Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL 50.0 50.0 0.0 55.7 401No Change
Students w/ disabilities 47.7 43.5 -4.2 53.9 460Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 12--
Hispanic/Latino 68.2 78.9 10.7 74.0 1904Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 83.5 89.7 6.2 86.4 784Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 3.4 4.4 1.0 3.1 1,3320Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 4.2 5.5 1.3 3.8 9460Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.3 5.5 1.2 3.9 8860Declined
EL and Former EL 5.2 6.8 1.6 4.7 2370Declined
Students w/ disabilities 5.2 4.2 -1.0 4.7 2363Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian---- 11--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 32--
Hispanic/Latino 3.9 4.8 0.9 3.5 9930Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 1.7 2.2 0.5 1.5 2770Declined

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 14.0 10.8 -3.2 15.5 2500Declined
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL 14.0 10.8 -3.2 15.5 2500Declined
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 33.8 32.7 -1.1 30.8 1,5692Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 26.7 39.0 12.3 19.8 770Declined
High needs 39.2 37.6 -1.6 35.6 1,2512Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 40.3 39.3 -1.0 36.3 1,0962Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL 45.7 43.4 -2.3 41.3 4682Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 42.0 42.8 0.8 38.2 3180Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 40--
Hispanic/Latino 37.3 35.4 -1.9 33.4 1,2492Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---- 1--
White 18.0 18.4 0.4 14.4 2501No Change

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2018 Rate (%) 2019 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 39.9 45.0 5.1 45.6 7383Met Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 30.0 36.4 6.4 35.6 5713Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 31.2 36.5 5.3 36.9 5453Met Target
EL and Former EL 19.2 22.9 3.7 24.8 1882Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities 7.1 27.0 19.9 13.0 1374Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 21--
Hispanic/Latino 32.7 40.0 7.3 40.2 5783Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 64.5 66.7 2.2 69.9 1232Improved Below Target


About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools not requiring assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district's or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines multiple years of data related to achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The annual criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

The cumulative criterion-referenced target percentage represents a weighted average of the annual criterion-referenced target percentages. At a minimum, a group must have an annual criterion-referenced target percentage for the most recent year in order to receive a cumulative percentage.

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using multiple years of data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of Accountability Terms Glossary of 2019 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles