Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kingston

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Kingston

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Kingston (01450000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
K,01,02,03,04,05,06

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
69% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Meets requirements (MR)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(Non-high school grades)
Lowest performing students
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement24-24-
Science achievement14----
Achievement total71267.56867.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth34-34-
Mathematics growth34-24-
Growth total6822.55822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate------
Extended engagement rate------
Annual dropout rate------
High school completion total------
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-44-
Advanced coursework completion------
Additional indicators total4410.04410.0
Weighted total6.510.3-5.67.6-
Percentage of possible points 63%-74%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage69%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(Non-high school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement34-
Science achievement44-
Achievement total111267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth24-
Mathematics growth24-
Growth total4822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate---
Extended engagement rate---
Annual dropout rate---
High school completion total---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion---
Additional indicators total4410.0
Weighted total8.710.3-
Percentage of possible points 84%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage84%
Meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 499.5 503.6 4.1 501.3 5744Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 480.4 486.1 5.7 484.8 984Exceeded Target
High needs 488.3 491.7 3.4 489.8 1894Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.4 496.2 3.8 494.0 1064Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 482.0 484.8 2.8 483.4 1084Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 499.8 504.3 4.5 501.8 5384Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 501.5 501.7 0.2 503.2 5722Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing 480.1 481.4 1.3 482.7 982Improved Below Target
High needs 488.2 489.4 1.2 489.7 1883Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 492.7 494.9 2.2 493.8 1054Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 481.8 481.2 -0.6 483.3 1080Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 3--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 501.9 502.4 0.5 503.6 5372Improved Below Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 79.7 77.4 -2.3 81.5 1561No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 60.5 64.7 4.2 62.8 514Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 71.0 71.3 0.3 73.1 342Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 50.8 56.5 5.7 53.1 274Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 1--
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black---- 3--
Hispanic/Latino---- 9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 81.0 78.9 -2.1 82.8 1411No Change

English language arts growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 51.9 50.0 4123Met Target
Lowest Performing 52.9 50.0 983Met Target
High needs 46.2 50.0 1282Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 48.5 50.0 752Below Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 45.0 50.0 712Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 51.6 50.0 3873Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 50.5 50.0 4113Met Target
Lowest Performing 48.8 50.0 982Below Target
High needs 47.2 50.0 1282Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 51.2 50.0 753Met Target
EL and Former EL-- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 42.1 50.0 712Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-- 1--
Asian-- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black-- 2--
Hispanic/Latino-- 15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 50.5 50.0 3863Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 6.6 3.7 2.9 5.5 9154Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 8.9 4.1 4.8 6.8 984Exceeded Target
High needs 13.1 7.4 5.7 11.2 3244Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.1 8.6 9.5 15.5 1634Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL---- 25--
Students w/ disabilities 9.9 7.5 2.4 7.5 1613Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 5--
Asian---- 3--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 14--
Hispanic/Latino---- 33--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 6.0 3.2 2.8 5.0 8554Exceeded Target

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 580 578100Yes 1 579 57699Yes 1 160 160100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 195 19399Yes 1 194 19299Yes 1 55 55100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 110 10999Yes 1 109 10899Yes 1 36 36100Yes 1
EL and Former EL 9---- 9---- 4----
Students w/ disabilities 110 10898Yes 1 110 10898Yes 1 29 29100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. 3---- 3---- 1----
Asian 3---- 3---- 0----
Afr. Amer./Black 7---- 7---- 3----
Hispanic/Latino 19---- 18---- 9----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 4---- 4---- 2----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 544 542100Yes 1 544 54199Yes 1 145 145100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Kingston ElementaryInsufficient data
Kingston IntermediateNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles