Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Norfolk County Agricultural

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2018 Official Accountability Report - Norfolk County Agricultural

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME
Norfolk County Agricultural (09150000)
TITLE I STATUS
Title I District
REGION
Coastal
GRADES SERVED
09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classificationNot requiring assistance or intervention
Reason for classification
Partially meeting targets
Progress toward improvement targetsAccountability percentile
42% - Partially meeting targets-
This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs assistance (NA)

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator All students
(High school grades)
Lowest performing students
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight % Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-44-
Mathematics achievement04-04-
Science achievement14-04-
Achievement total51247.541267.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-14-
Mathematics growth24-14-
Growth total3822.52822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44----
Extended engagement rate44----
Annual dropout rate44----
High school completion total121220.0---
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total------
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism04-04-
Advanced coursework completion14----
Additional indicators total1810.00410.0
Weighted total5.610.7-3.210.3-
Percentage of possible points 52%-31%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage42%
Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator High needs Subgroup
(High school grades)
Points earned Total possible points Weight %
AchievementEnglish language arts achievement44-
Mathematics achievement04-
Science achievement04-
Achievement total41247.5
GrowthEnglish language arts growth14-
Mathematics growth14-
Growth total2822.5
High school completionFour-year cohort graduation rate44-
Extended engagement rate44-
Annual dropout rate44-
High school completion total121220.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiencyEnglish language proficiency total---
Additional indicatorsChronic absenteeism44-
Advanced coursework completion14-
Additional indicators total5810.0
Weighted total5.310.7-
Percentage of possible points 50%-
Criterion-referenced target percentage50%
Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments -

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 99.1 99.6 0.5 100.0 1244Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing 96.4 98.4 2.0 98.2 324Exceeded Target
High needs 98.5 99.4 0.9 100.0 414Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 20--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 97.7 99.0 1.3 100.0 254Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 99.1 99.6 0.5 100.0 1144Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 95.1 92.2 -2.9 96.8 1220Declined
Lowest Performing 80.7 71.1 -9.6 83.5 320Declined
High needs 92.9 87.8 -5.1 95.0 390Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 19--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 90.6 83.3 -7.3 93.6 240Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 95.5 92.2 -3.3 97.1 1120Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school
Group 2017 Achievement 2018 Achievement Change 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 96.8 94.7 -2.1 98.5 1191No Change
Lowest Performing 93.6 84.4 -9.2 97.9 320Declined
High needs 96.0 90.5 -5.5 98.8 370Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 18--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 93.8 88.6 -5.2 96.8 220Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 96.7 94.4 -2.3 98.5 1111No Change

English language arts growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 34.8 50.0 1031Below Target
Lowest Performing 35.0 50.0 261Below Target
High needs 34.2 50.0 331Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 17--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 35.1 50.0 961Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school
Group 2018 Mean SGP 2018 Target N Points Reason
All Students 41.8 50.0 1022Below Target
Lowest Performing 30.0 50.0 261Below Target
High needs 39.5 50.0 321Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged-- 16--
EL and Former EL-----
Students w/ disabilities-- 19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-----
Asian-----
Afr. Amer./Black-----
Hispanic/Latino-- 3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-- 4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-----
White 42.4 50.0 952Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1204Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 504Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 31--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 0--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino---- 2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 1154Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school
Group 2015 Rate (%) 2016 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 98.1 100.0 1.9 99.8 1124Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 94.7 100.0 5.3 98.7 404Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 21--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 95.2 100.0 4.8 100.0 234Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian---- 1--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 1--
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 98.0 100.0 2.0 99.8 1094Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school
Group 2016 Rate (%) 2017 Rate (%) Change Target (%) N Points Reason
All Students 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 5344Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1574Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 75--
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 934Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 5--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 8--
Hispanic/Latino---- 17--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 15--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 4874Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students-------
Lowest Performing-------
High needs-------
Econ. Disadvantaged-------
EL and Former EL-------
Students w/ disabilities-------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.-------
Asian-------
Afr. Amer./Black-------
Hispanic/Latino-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White-------

Chronic absenteeism - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 12.9 13.8 -0.9 11.8 5500Declined
Lowest Performing 14.3 21.9 -7.6 7.7 320Declined
High needs 20.4 17.2 3.2 18.0 1924Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 78--
EL and Former EL---- 5--
Students w/ disabilities 12.1 15.5 -3.4 9.0 1100Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 4--
Asian---- 8--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 7--
Hispanic/Latino---- 18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 17--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 12.3 13.9 -1.6 11.1 4960Declined

Advanced coursework completion - High school
Group 2017 Rate (%) 2018 Rate (%) Change Target N Points Reason
All Students 46.3 45.8 -0.5 52.0 2771No Change
Lowest Performing-------
High needs 30.9 30.2 -0.7 39.4 861No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged---- 45--
EL and Former EL---- 2--
Students w/ disabilities 23.1 19.2 -3.9 30.4 520Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---- 2--
Asian---- 4--
Afr. Amer./Black---- 5--
Hispanic/Latino---- 12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.---- 7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.-------
White 47.8 43.7 -4.1 53.1 2470Declined

Assessment participation
Group English language arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate Enrolled Assessed % Met Target? Years in Rate
All Students 125 12499Yes 1 125 12298Yes 1 125 125100Yes 1
Lowest Performing---------------
High needs 41 41100Yes 1 41 3995Yes 1 41 41100Yes 1
Econ. Disadvantaged 20 20100Yes 1 20 1995Yes 1 20 20100Yes 1
EL and Former EL---------------
Students w/ disabilities 25 25100Yes 1 25 2496Yes 1 25 25100Yes 1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.---------------
Asian 1---- 1---- 1----
Afr. Amer./Black 1---- 1---- 1----
Hispanic/Latino 3---- 3---- 3----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. 5---- 5---- 5----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.---------------
White 115 11499Yes 1 115 11297Yes 1 115 115100Yes 1

School Accountability Information
School Accountability classification
Norfolk County AgriculturalNot requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.


Resources
Interpretive Materials Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms

School and District Profiles