Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Haverhill

Districts Schools

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Haverhill

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Haverhill (01280000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12
Accountability and Assistance Level:	Partially meeting targets

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (Non-high school grades)			Lowest performing students (Non-high school grades)			All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-	2	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	0	4	-	-	-	-	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Achievement total	2	12	60.0	6	8	67.5	10	12	40.0	8	8	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	2	4	-	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	20.0	4	8	22.5	5	8	20.0	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	1	4	10.0	-	-	-	3	4	10.0	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	0	4	-	3	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	0	4	10.0	3	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		2.1	9.6	-	5.0	7.6	-	7.6	10.0	-	6.7	7.6	-
Percentage of possible points		22%		-	66%		-	76%		-	88%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		44% Weight of non-high school results:70%						82% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		55%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (Non-high school grades)			High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	2	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-	4	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	4	4	-
	Achievement total	3	12	67.5	11	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	2	4	-	3	4	-
	Mathematics growth	2	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	5	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	-	-	-	2	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	-	-	-	4	4	-
	High school completion total	-	-	-	10	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	0	4	-	2	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	-	-	-	1	4	-
	Additional indicators total	0	4	10.0	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		2.9	10.3	-	8.7	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		28%		-	81%		-
Percentage of possible points by gradespan		28% Weight of non-high school results:70%			81% Weight of high school results:30%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		44%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	493.1	493.5	0.4	494.9	3,695	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	470.9	473.4	2.5	475.3	617	2	Improved Below Target
High needs	487.2	487.6	0.4	488.7	2,344	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	488.1	488.6	0.5	489.7	1,898	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	482.4	483.3	0.9	484.2	533	2	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	479.9	479.5	-0.4	481.3	889	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	74	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	157	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	487.0	487.4	0.4	488.7	1,284	2	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	62	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
White	496.7	497.2	0.5	498.7	2,103	2	Improved Below Target

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	94.6	96.1	1.5	96.1	414	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	86.7	90.9	4.2	88.7	88	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	89.3	92.0	2.7	91.2	204	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	90.7	92.6	1.9	92.5	165	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	79.5	85.7	6.2	82.2	42	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	84.9	87.5	2.6	87.2	74	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	87.8	92.4	4.6	89.7	119	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	97.7	97.5	-0.2	99.2	262	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - Next-Generation MCAS average composite scaled score - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	492.8	491.8	-1.0	494.5	3,690	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	467.3	470.6	3.3	469.9	616	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	486.1	485.1	-1.0	487.6	2,345	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	486.7	485.4	-1.3	487.8	1,897	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	483.2	481.8	-1.4	485.0	538	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	478.6	476.9	-1.7	480.1	888	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	74	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	155	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	485.2	484.7	-0.5	487.2	1,286	1	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	61	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
White	497.0	496.2	-0.8	498.7	2,099	0	Declined

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	84.2	88.5	4.3	86.0	414	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	50.9	66.5	15.6	53.7	88	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	74.4	79.9	5.5	76.9	205	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	74.5	81.0	6.5	77.2	166	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	71.5	70.6	-0.9	75.4	40	1	No Change
Students w/ disabilities	64.8	72.7	7.9	67.7	76	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	71.8	79.8	8.0	74.7	119	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	90.3	92.4	2.1	92.1	262	3	Met Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	66.3	62.3	-4.0	68.1	1,199	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	57.4	55.5	-1.9	59.7	750	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	57.6	56.4	-1.2	59.7	604	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	47.7	43.4	-4.3	50.5	151	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	52.5	47.8	-4.7	54.8	276	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	24	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	57	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	53.5	50.1	-3.4	56.0	358	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	73.4	68.3	-5.1	75.2	741	0	Declined

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	86.3	89.1	2.8	88.1	368	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	76.1	80.2	4.1	78.4	169	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	77.3	81.3	4.0	79.4	131	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	66.4	73.4	7.0	69.2	32	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	71.7	74.6	2.9	74.0	63	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	73.5	80.7	7.2	76.0	96	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	91.3	92.2	0.9	93.1	248	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	46.3	50.0	2,744	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	47.7	50.0	593	2	Below Target
High needs	44.5	50.0	1,657	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	44.9	50.0	1,335	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	46.8	50.0	360	2	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	41.5	50.0	575	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	5	-	-
Asian	-	-	61	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	113	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	45.6	50.0	866	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	40	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	6	-	-
White	46.0	50.0	1,653	2	Below Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	53.8	50.0	298	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	46.4	50.0	68	2	Below Target
High needs	53.3	50.0	128	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	53.8	50.0	109	3	Met Target
EL and Former EL	59.4	50.0	20	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	44.6	50.0	37	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	56.1	50.0	78	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	53.6	50.0	197	3	Met Target

Mathematics growth - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	48.6	50.0	2,742	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	46.9	50.0	592	2	Below Target
High needs	46.0	50.0	1,657	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	46.2	50.0	1,337	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	45.8	50.0	370	2	Below Target
Students w/ disabilities	39.8	50.0	565	1	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	5	-	-
Asian	-	-	61	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	114	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	46.4	50.0	876	2	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	40	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	6	-	-
White	49.5	50.0	1,640	2	Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	45.0	50.0	302	2	Below Target
Lowest Performing	43.9	50.0	69	2	Below Target
High needs	47.1	50.0	130	2	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	46.8	50.0	111	2	Below Target
EL and Former EL	60.1	50.0	20	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	46.6	50.0	38	2	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	51.4	50.0	79	3	Met Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	42.1	50.0	200	2	Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	74.4	80.0	5.6	76.4	525	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	64.6	72.2	7.6	68.7	338	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	64.9	72.2	7.3	69.4	313	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	51.7	59.0	7.3	57.3	39	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	44.9	52.8	7.9	50.8	125	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	60.5	76.9	16.4	64.4	160	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	79.2	82.0	2.8	81.3	328	4	Exceeded Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	79.0	79.3	0.3	80.6	497	2	Improved Below Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	71.2	72.0	0.8	74.7	328	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	70.9	71.8	0.9	74.8	291	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	46.5	58.6	12.1	51.0	29	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	59.2	59.6	0.4	64.1	136	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	64.9	64.3	-0.6	68.4	129	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	84.5	84.8	0.3	86.3	342	2	Improved Below Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	5.9	2.3	3.6	5.3	1,838	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	8.4	4.7	3.7	7.6	843	4	Exceeded Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.5	4.7	3.8	7.7	643	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	16.9	1.7	15.2	15.2	121	4	Exceeded Target
Students w/ disabilities	9.3	9.3	0.0	8.4	322	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	40	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	67	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.5	3.0	4.5	6.8	576	4	Exceeded Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	5.5	1.7	3.8	5.0	1,138	4	Exceeded Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	60.6	56.0	-4.6	69.2	455	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	60.6	56.0	-4.6	69.2	455	1	No Change
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	29.6	36.4	6.8	42.0	99	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	29.6	36.4	6.8	42.0	99	3	Met Target
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - Non-high school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	16.3	19.4	-3.1	15.2	5,154	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	18.4	24.8	-6.4	16.3	620	0	Declined
High needs	21.6	25.6	-4.0	19.7	3,401	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	24.5	28.5	-4.0	21.9	2,494	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	19.3	21.9	-2.6	15.9	872	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	20.6	24.6	-4.0	18.2	1,146	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	89	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	222	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	22.2	24.0	-1.8	19.4	1,929	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	96	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
White	13.5	16.6	-3.1	12.5	2,800	0	Declined

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	31.1	30.5	0.6	30.0	1,979	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	38.1	35.2	2.9	36.0	88	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	46.0	45.0	1.0	44.1	1,003	2	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	49.6	48.7	0.9	47.0	718	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	44.0	47.5	-3.5	40.6	217	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	44.0	40.8	3.2	41.6	316	4	Exceeded Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	93	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	46.3	47.6	-1.3	43.5	628	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	23.9	21.8	2.1	22.9	1,194	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	49.0	44.8	-4.2	53.6	820	0	Declined
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	22.4	22.1	-0.3	29.4	344	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.5	25.2	-0.3	34.6	274	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	26.0	17.5	-8.5	31.6	63	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities	6.9	5.7	-1.2	12.4	123	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	29.6	26.8	-2.8	38.2	228	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	56.7	53.9	-2.8	61.8	529	0	Declined

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	4,213	4,168	99	Yes	1	4,209	4,172	99	Yes	1	1,663	1,643	99	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	2,647	2,607	98	Yes	1	2,645	2,618	99	Yes	1	1,000	984	98	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	2,134	2,105	99	Yes	1	2,132	2,114	99	Yes	1	801	790	99	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	649	634	98	Yes	1	648	646	100	Yes	1	219	218	100	Yes	1
Students w/ disabilities	992	966	97	Yes	1	993	971	98	Yes	1	375	359	96	Yes	1
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	9	-	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-
Asian	81	81	100	Yes	1	81	81	100	Yes	1	31	31	100	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	183	183	100	Yes	1	182	180	99	Yes	1	79	79	100	Yes	1
Hispanic/Latino	1,476	1,456	99	Yes	1	1,475	1,467	99	Yes	1	504	499	99	Yes	1
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	69	67	97	Yes	1	68	66	97	Yes	1	22	21	95	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	7	-	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-
White	2,387	2,365	99	Yes	1	2,386	2,361	99	Yes	1	1,022	1,008	99	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Bradford Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Caleb Dustin Hunking School	Insufficient data
Consentino Annex at Bartlett School	Insufficient data
Consentino Middle School	Requiring assistance or intervention
Crowell	Insufficient data
Dr Paul Nettle	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Golden Hill	Requiring assistance or intervention
Greenleaf Kindergarten Center	Insufficient data
Haverhill Alternative School	Requiring assistance or intervention
Haverhill High	Not requiring assistance or intervention
John G Whittier	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Moody	Insufficient data
Pentucket Lake Elementary	Not requiring assistance or intervention
TEACH	Requiring assistance or intervention
Tilton	Not requiring assistance or intervention
Walnut Square	Insufficient data

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms