Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Lincoln-Sudbury

Districts Schools

2018

2018 Official Accountability Report - Lincoln-Sudbury

Organization Information
DISTRICT NAME Lincoln-Sudbury (06950000)	TITLE I STATUS Title I District
REGION Coastal	GRADES SERVED 09,10,11,12

Accountability Information

Overall classification	Requiring assistance or intervention

Reason for classification
In need of focused/targeted support Low participation rate: Students w/disabilities

Progress toward improvement targets	Accountability percentile
55% - Partially meeting targets	-

This district's determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention
Needs intervention (NI)

OVERALL AND SUBGROUP DATA
DETAILED DATA FOR EACH INDICATOR
SCHOOLS IN THIS DISTRICT

Overall results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		All students (High school grades)			Lowest performing students (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %	Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	4	4	-	0	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Achievement total	9	12	47.5	4	12	67.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-	0	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-	2	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5	2	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Extended engagement rate	4	4	-	-	-	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-	-	-	-
	High school completion total	10	12	20.0	-	-	-
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	4	4	-	4	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	3	4	-	-	-	-
	Additional indicators total	7	8	10.0	4	4	10.0
Weighted total		7.9	10.7	-	3.6	10.3	-
Percentage of possible points		74%		-	35%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		55%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets

Subgroup results

Progress toward improvement targets
Indicator		High needs Subgroup (High school grades)
Indicator		Points earned	Total possible points	Weight %
Achievement	English language arts achievement	1	4	-
	Mathematics achievement	0	4	-
	Science achievement	1	4	-
	Achievement total	2	12	47.5
Growth	English language arts growth	1	4	-
	Mathematics growth	3	4	-
	Growth total	4	8	22.5
High school completion	Four-year cohort graduation rate	3	4	-
	Extended engagement rate	3	4	-
	Annual dropout rate	3	4	-
	High school completion total	9	12	20.0
Progress toward attaining English language proficiency	English language proficiency total	-	-	-
Additional indicators	Chronic absenteeism	3	4	-
	Advanced coursework completion	0	4	-
	Additional indicators total	3	8	10.0
Weighted total		4.0	10.7	-
Percentage of possible points		37%		-
Criterion-referenced target percentage		37%
Criterion-referenced target percentage		Partially meeting targets
Subgroup percentile
This group's overall performance relative to the performance of the same subgroup in schools administering similar assessments		-

Detailed data for each indicator

English language arts achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.4	99.2	-0.2	100.0	357	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	99.5	98.2	-1.3	100.0	85	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	97.6	96.8	-0.8	99.2	78	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	97.6	98.9	1.3	99.5	22	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	96.8	96.5	-0.3	98.7	64	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	21	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	97.8	100.0	2.2	99.4	20	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.4	99.3	-0.1	100.0	288	4	Exceeded Target

Mathematics achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	98.5	97.7	-0.8	100.0	357	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	98.0	93.2	-4.8	100.0	88	0	Declined
High needs	93.1	90.4	-2.7	95.3	78	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.3	91.7	-4.6	98.3	21	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	91.0	89.1	-1.9	94.0	64	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	21	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	96.7	97.5	0.8	98.5	20	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	98.4	98.1	-0.3	100.0	287	4	Exceeded Target

Science achievement - legacy MCAS Composite Performance Index (CPI) - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Achievement	2018 Achievement	Change	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	97.1	96.4	-0.7	98.5	343	1	No Change
Lowest Performing	92.2	88.9	-3.3	94.3	88	0	Declined
High needs	89.7	87.3	-2.4	92.0	75	1	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged	91.3	91.3	0.0	93.2	20	1	No Change
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	87.9	85.5	-2.4	90.2	62	1	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	98.8	100.0	1.2	100.0	21	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	92.9	97.5	4.6	94.7	20	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	97.9	96.8	-1.1	99.3	277	3	Met Target

English language arts growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	37.1	50.0	323	1	Below Target
Lowest Performing	22.0	50.0	78	0	Below Target
High needs	30.5	50.0	67	1	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	30.4	50.0	56	1	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	34.8	50.0	20	1	Below Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	9	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	36.2	50.0	260	1	Below Target

Mathematics growth - High school About the Data
Group	2018 Mean SGP	2018 Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	51.0	50.0	320	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	46.6	50.0	79	2	Below Target
High needs	51.0	50.0	66	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	18	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	51.5	50.0	55	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	66.8	50.0	20	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-
White	49.8	50.0	256	2	Below Target

Four-year cohort graduation rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	95.7	97.1	1.4	96.9	449	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	85.2	88.0	2.8	88.4	108	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	80.6	82.0	1.4	84.6	50	2	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	82.6	83.8	1.2	87.2	80	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	25	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	95.2	97.1	1.9	96.6	380	3	Met Target

Extended engagement rate - High school About the Data
Group	2015 Rate (%)	2016 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	99.5	99.5	0.0	100.0	395	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	98.2	98.1	-0.1	100.0	108	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	96.8	100.0	3.2	100.0	36	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	97.7	97.7	0.0	100.0	86	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	100.0	100.0	0.0	100.0	20	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	99.7	99.4	-0.3	100.0	332	4	Exceeded Target

Annual dropout rate - High school About the Data
Group	2016 Rate (%)	2017 Rate (%)	Change	Target (%)	N	Points	Reason
All Students	0.1	0.1	0.0	1.0	1,565	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	0.3	0.3	0.0	1.0	302	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.2	0.0	1.2	1.1	86	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.4	-0.4	1.0	238	3	Met Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	95	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	68	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	66	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	0.0	0.0	0.0	1.0	72	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	0.0	0.1	-0.1	1.0	1,262	3	Met Target

Progress toward attaining English language proficiency - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Chronic absenteeism - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	5.3	4.5	0.8	4.3	1,569	4	Exceeded Target
Lowest Performing	4.9	2.3	2.6	0.0	87	4	Exceeded Target
High needs	13.7	11.5	2.2	11.0	358	3	Met Target
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.5	18.1	4.4	18.7	94	4	Exceeded Target
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	13.2	12.2	1.0	9.3	287	2	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian	1.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	100	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	70	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	76	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4.1	4.3	-0.2	3.1	70	4	Exceeded Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	5.0	3.9	1.1	3.7	1,251	4	Exceeded Target

Advanced coursework completion - High school About the Data
Group	2017 Rate (%)	2018 Rate (%)	Change	Target	N	Points	Reason
All Students	91.1	85.3	-5.8	94.3	756	3	Met Target
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	51.7	48.6	-3.1	59.7	142	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged	60.4	52.4	-8.0	68.9	42	0	Declined
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	45.6	43.5	-2.1	53.1	108	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	96.2	98.0	1.8	100.0	49	4	Exceeded Target
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	36	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	93.1	78.9	-14.2	96.3	38	0	Declined
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White	92.4	87.4	-5.0	95.4	594	3	Met Target

Assessment participation About the Data
Group	English language arts					Mathematics					Science
Group	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target?	Years in Rate
All Students	363	358	99	Yes	1	363	358	99	Yes	1	363	356	98	Yes	1
Lowest Performing	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	83	79	95	Yes	1	83	79	95	Yes	1	83	79	95	Yes	1
Econ. Disadvantaged	22	22	100	Yes	1	22	21	95	Yes	1	22	21	95	Yes	1
EL and Former EL	2	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	69	65	94	No	1	69	65	95	Yes	2	69	65	95	Yes	2
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-
Asian	21	21	100	Yes	1	21	21	100	Yes	1	21	21	100	Yes	1
Afr. Amer./Black	15	-	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	-	15	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	20	20	100	Yes	1	20	20	100	Yes	1	20	20	100	Yes	1
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	293	289	99	Yes	1	293	288	98	Yes	1	293	288	98	Yes	1

School Accountability Information About the Data
School	Accountability classification
Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High	Not requiring assistance or intervention

About this Report

Overall classification: All Massachusetts districts and schools with sufficient data are classified into one of two accountability categories: districts and schools requiring assistance or intervention, and districts and schools without required assistance or intervention. The reason(s) for the district or school's classification are noted on this report.

Progress toward improvement targets: The criterion-referenced target percentage combines information about achievement, growth, high school completion, English learner progress, advanced coursework completion, and chronic absenteeism into a single number between 0 and 100. For a group to be considered to be meeting targets it must have a criterion-referenced target percentage of 75% or higher.

The criterion-referenced target percentage is calculated by dividing the weighted total points earned by the weighted total possible points. The calculation for each is displayed below.

Weighted total of points earned = (Total achievement points earned x Achievement weight) + (Total growth points earned x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion points earned x high school completion weight) + (EL progress points earned x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator points earned x Additional indicator weight)

Weighted total of possible points = (Total achievement possible points x Achievement weight) + (Total growth possible points x Growth weight) + (Total high school completion possible points x high school completion weight) + (EL progress possible points x EL progress weight) + (Total additional indicator possible points x Additional indicator weight)

Accountability percentile: An accountability percentile between 1 and 99 is reported for most schools. This number is an indication of the school's overall performance relative to other schools that serve similar grades, and is calculated using data for all accountability indicators. School percentiles are not calculated for districts.

Determination of need for special education technical assistance or intervention: The U.S. Department of Education requires Massachusetts to determine which districts (including single school districts) have specific needs for technical assistance or intervention in the area of special education. A district's determination is based on four categories: Meets Requirements (MR); Needs Assistance (NA); Needs Intervention (NI); and Needs Substantial Intervention (NSI). In most cases these categories correspond to the district's results, except when the district has specific compliance needs. This designation helps signal whether outcomes for all students in the district indicate progress, including that of students with disabilities, or whether technical assistance and/or intervention is needed to improve outcomes for all children, especially students with disabilities.

Resources
Interpretive Materials
Glossary of 2018 Accountability Terms