Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Baystate Academy Charter Public School (District)

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Baystate Academy Charter Public School (District)

District Information

District:

Baystate Academy Charter Public School (District) (35020000)

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Insufficient data

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.8	85.9	85.2	-0.7	81.5	88.9	28	233	100	Above Target
High needs		75.3	83.2	83.3	0.1	79.4	87.7	69	183	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.0	85.0	83.1	-1.9	86.3	92.5	47	166	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		70.7	70.7	83.8	13.1	73.1	85.4	78	37	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		63.0	63.0	66.0	3.0	66.1	81.5	41	36	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		80.8	87.5	83.3	-4.2	84.0	90.4	56	75	75	On Target
Hispanic/Latino		75.6	85.2	86.2	1.0	79.7	87.8	70	138	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.3	59.0	64.2	5.2	56.9	74.2	14	234	100	Above Target
High needs		47.3	56.0	62.6	6.6	56.1	73.7	47	184	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.4	57.4	62.3	4.9	61.0	78.7	27	167	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		52.9	52.9	67.6	14.7	56.8	76.5	72	37	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		38.0	38.0	39.2	1.2	43.2	69.0	14	37	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		41.0	54.9	56.0	1.1	50.8	70.5	29	75	100	Above Target
Hispanic/Latino		49.7	60.0	66.9	6.9	58.1	74.9	56	139	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		55.1	55.1	53.9	-1.2	58.8	77.6	11	83	25	No Change
High needs		51.4	51.4	50.8	-0.6	55.5	75.7	14	64	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.5	52.5	52.2	-0.3	56.5	76.3	19	57	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		54.3	-	-	-	-	77.2	-	33	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		54.4	54.4	58.1	3.7	58.2	77.2	57	43	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	6.7	5.6	233	0	5.8	6.4	233	0
High needs	4.2	4.4	183	0	7.1	8.2	183	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.5	4.8	166	0	5.2	8.4	166	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	2.7	37	25	17.1	5.4	37	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	36	0	20.0	25.0	36	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.3	4.0	75	0	6.6	8.0	75	0
Hispanic/Latino	7.0	5.8	138	0	4.7	5.1	138	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.0	6.0	234	25	31.8	25.2	234	25
High needs	2.4	4.3	184	25	34.5	26.6	184	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.6	4.8	167	25	31.6	25.7	167	25
EL and Former EL	2.9	2.7	37	0	42.9	24.3	37	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	37	0	60.0	64.9	37	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	5.3	4.0	75	0	31.6	28.0	75	25
Hispanic/Latino	1.6	5.8	139	25	33.6	24.5	139	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	0.0	83	0	28.8	30.1	83	0
High needs	0.0	0.0	64	0	33.3	34.4	64	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	57	0	30.0	33.3	57	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	33	-	-	-	33	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	43	0	28.9	27.9	43	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.0	51.0	-22.0	51.0	No	221	75	On Target
High needs		72.0	52.0	-20.0	51.0	No	174	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.0	50.0	-22.0	51.0	No	158	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		66.0	68.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	34	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		72.5	46.5	-26.0	51.0	No	70	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		73.0	52.0	-21.0	51.0	No	133	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	51.0	0.0	51.0	No	219	75	On Target
High needs		51.5	52.5	1.0	51.0	No	172	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		51.5	51.0	-0.5	51.0	No	157	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		54.0	59.5	5.5	51.0	Yes	34	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	32	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		46.0	47.5	1.5	51.0	No	70	50	Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		51.0	51.0	0.0	51.0	No	131	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	65.5	60.0	26.00	25
High needs	65.5	60.0	26.00	25
EL and Former EL	65.5	60.0	26.00	25

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	234	233	100	Yes	234	234	100	Yes	83	83	100	Yes
High needs	184	183	99	Yes	184	184	100	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	167	166	99	Yes	167	167	100	Yes	57	57	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	37	37	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	9	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	37	36	97	Yes	37	37	100	Yes	16	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	75	75	100	Yes	75	75	100	Yes	33	33	100	Yes
Hispanic/Latino	139	138	99	Yes	139	139	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.