Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical

District Information

District:

Nashoba Valley Regional Vocational Technical (08520000)

Region:

Northeast

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.2	97.5	98.9	1.4	97.2	97.6	66	181	100	Above Target
High needs		91.0	95.9	98.1	2.2	94.8	95.5	83	90	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		96.9	96.9	98.1	1.2	97.2	98.5	78	40	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		88.1	94.1	98.4	4.3	93.1	94.1	90	62	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.1	98.7	99.1	0.4	97.1	97.6	60	160	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.3	89.8	92.2	2.4	94.9	95.7	51	180	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		86.4	81.4	87.2	5.8	92.1	93.2	71	90	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.0	87.0	90.4	3.4	88.1	93.5	76	39	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		82.2	74.6	83.3	8.7	89.6	91.1	76	63	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		91.1	90.8	92.9	2.1	94.8	95.6	42	159	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.7	91.6	93.1	1.5	92.2	93.4	55	171	75	On Target
High needs		79.8	86.4	88.9	2.5	88.2	89.9	76	83	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.6	86.6	93.4	6.8	87.7	93.3	89	34	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		73.1	81.4	84.9	3.5	84.3	86.6	76	58	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.5	91.9	93.3	1.4	92.1	93.3	43	153	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.1	27.6	181	25	0.0	0.6	181	0
High needs	17.3	16.7	90	0	0.0	1.1	90	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	28.6	17.5	40	0	0.0	2.5	40	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.7	14.5	62	25	0.0	0.0	62	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.6	28.8	160	25	0.0	0.6	160	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	42.9	41.7	180	0	5.6	1.7	180	25
High needs	36.1	24.4	90	0	10.3	3.3	90	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	47.9	25.6	39	0	8.3	0.0	39	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	23.4	20.6	63	0	15.6	4.8	63	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	44.0	42.1	159	0	4.8	1.3	159	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	23.9	25.1	171	0	2.8	0.0	171	25
High needs	12.5	14.5	83	25	5.7	0.0	83	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.3	17.6	34	0	9.3	0.0	34	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	6.8	12.1	58	25	8.5	0.0	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.5	23.5	153	0	2.6	0.0	153	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	42.5	4.5	51.0	Yes	176	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	36.5	-9.5	51.0	Yes	88	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	28.0	-11.0	51.0	Yes	39	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	41.5	-5.5	51.0	Yes	60	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.5	43.0	4.5	51.0	Yes	156	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.0	48.5	-5.5	51.0	No	174	50	Below Target
High needs		52.5	43.0	-9.5	51.0	Yes	87	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	39.5	-8.5	51.0	No	38	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	52.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	60	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		54.0	51.0	-3.0	51.0	No	154	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.1	98.2	3.1	80.0	90.0	165	100	Above Target
High needs		94.5	98.2	3.7	80.0	90.0	111	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		96.8	98.5	1.7	80.0	90.0	68	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		94.6	98.6	4.0	80.0	90.0	144	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.1	95.1	-1.0	85.0	95.0	162	100	Above Target
High needs		98.8	94.5	-4.3	85.0	95.0	91	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		98.1	96.8	-1.3	85.0	95.0	62	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
White		96.6	94.6	-2.0	85.0	95.0	147	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.5	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.3	80	735	75	On Target
High needs		0.7	0.3	0.0	0.3	0.4	0.4	91	340	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	141	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	0.0	0.0	88	240	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	39	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	29	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		0.3	0.3	0.3	0.0	0.2	0.2	73	651	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	182	181	99	Yes	182	180	99	Yes	182	181	99	Yes
High needs	91	90	99	Yes	91	90	99	Yes	91	90	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	40	40	100	Yes	40	39	98	Yes	40	39	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	63	62	98	Yes	63	63	100	Yes	63	63	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	161	160	99	Yes	161	159	99	Yes	161	160	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.