Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Montachusett Regional Vocational Technical

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Montachusett Regional Vocational Technical

District Information

District:

Montachusett Regional Vocational Technical (08320000)

Region:

Central

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.8	98.9	99.2	0.3	97.6	97.9	74	349	100	Above Target
High needs		93.2	96.8	98.8	2.0	96.0	96.6	91	128	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		98.4	98.4	99.4	1.0	98.5	99.2	94	86	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		86.3	93.1	97.9	4.8	92.0	93.2	84	60	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		91.3	98.2	99.4	1.2	94.9	95.7	96	43	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.4	99.1	99.2	0.1	97.9	98.2	62	292	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.8	95.3	93.2	-2.1	97.0	97.4	58	348	25	No Change
High needs		91.3	89.6	85.4	-4.2	94.9	95.7	64	127	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		94.1	94.1	88.4	-5.7	94.6	97.1	67	84	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		81.3	79.5	75.8	-3.7	89.1	90.7	59	61	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		90.1	93.5	86.9	-6.6	94.2	95.1	82	42	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.0	95.7	94.4	-1.3	97.7	98.0	53	292	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.3	91.9	91.9	0.0	93.8	94.7	48	345	25	No Change
High needs		83.9	85.5	87.5	2.0	90.6	92.0	68	126	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		91.5	91.5	91.3	-0.2	92.2	95.8	81	83	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.6	74.5	80.3	5.8	84.0	86.3	62	61	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.3	90.0	92.7	2.7	90.3	91.7	96	41	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.8	92.4	92.5	0.1	94.6	95.4	38	290	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	38.0	27.2	349	0	0.0	0.0	349	25
High needs	21.8	18.0	128	0	0.0	0.0	128	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	30.1	23.3	86	0	0.0	0.0	86	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.7	8.3	60	25	0.0	0.0	60	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	34.5	23.3	43	0	0.0	0.0	43	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	38.3	28.1	292	0	0.0	0.0	292	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	49.1	42.5	348	0	1.9	1.1	348	25
High needs	36.6	27.6	127	0	5.2	3.1	127	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	44.1	36.9	84	0	1.1	2.4	84	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	23.6	8.2	61	0	12.7	4.9	61	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	37.0	28.6	42	0	1.9	2.4	42	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	50.8	45.9	292	0	2.0	1.0	292	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.9	13.0	345	0	1.7	1.2	345	25
High needs	13.1	4.8	126	0	4.9	2.4	126	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.6	7.2	83	0	1.2	0.0	83	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	4.2	1.6	61	0	10.4	4.9	61	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.0	7.3	41	25	2.0	2.4	41	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.1	14.5	290	0	1.5	0.7	290	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		42.0	43.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	305	75	On Target
High needs		40.0	48.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	115	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		42.0	47.5	5.5	51.0	Yes	78	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	50.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	53	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		42.0	47.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	37	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		40.0	41.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	256	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		54.5	48.0	-6.5	51.0	No	306	50	Below Target
High needs		54.0	52.5	-1.5	51.0	No	114	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		55.5	50.5	-5.0	51.0	No	76	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	53.5	-0.5	51.0	No	54	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		44.0	45.0	1.0	51.0	No	36	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		58.0	48.0	-10.0	51.0	No	258	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	4.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	4.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	4.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.2	97.2	-1.0	80.0	90.0	323	100	Above Target
High needs		97.5	96.1	-1.4	80.0	90.0	178	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		97.6	91.5	-6.1	80.0	90.0	59	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		100.0	100.0	0.0	80.0	90.0	38	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	19	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		98.2	96.5	-1.7	80.0	90.0	260	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.2	98.8	1.6	85.0	95.0	332	100	Above Target
High needs		96.7	98.1	1.4	85.0	95.0	159	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		96.9	97.6	0.7	85.0	95.0	42	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		100.0	100.0	0.0	85.0	95.0	32	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	1	-	-
White		96.9	98.6	1.7	85.0	95.0	276	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.8	0.3	0.1	0.2	0.5	0.4	88	1435	100	Above Target
High needs		0.8	0.3	0.2	0.1	0.5	0.4	83	479	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	-	300	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		1.4	0.6	0.4	0.2	0.8	0.7	76	229	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		1.0	0.5	0.0	0.5	0.6	0.5	85	188	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	66	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		0.8	0.4	0.1	0.3	0.5	0.4	83	1154	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	351	349	99	Yes	351	348	99	Yes	351	351	100	Yes
High needs	129	128	99	Yes	129	127	98	Yes	129	129	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	86	86	100	Yes	86	84	98	Yes	86	86	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	61	60	98	Yes	61	61	100	Yes	61	61	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	43	43	100	Yes	43	42	98	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	294	292	99	Yes	294	292	99	Yes	294	294	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.