Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Up-Island Regional
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Up-Island Regional

District Information
District:Up-Island Regional (07740000)
Region:Southeast
Title I Status:Yes
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.1, Target = 97.1CPI = 91.1, Target = 97.1CPI = 91.1, Target = 97.1 95.0 90.0 91.1 1.1 97.1 97.5 6123650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 83.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 83.7, Target = 96.2CPI = 83.7, Target = 96.2 93.4 82.5 83.7 1.2 96.2 96.7 809850Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.2, Target = 88CPI = 87.2, Target = 88 86.9 86.9 87.2 0.3 88.0 93.5 844375On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.5, Target = 95.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 95.4CPI = 79.5, Target = 95.4 92.1 76.3 79.5 3.2 95.4 96.1 846650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.3, Target = 97.3 95.4 90.9 92.3 1.4 97.3 97.7 6520550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 94.4CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.4CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.4 90.4 85.5 89.7 4.2 94.4 95.2 8023675On Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 90.2CPI = 82.1, Target = 90.2CPI = 82.1, Target = 90.2 83.2 77.8 82.1 4.3 90.2 91.6 969975On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.8, Target = 81.6CPI = 81.8, Target = 81.6 79.9 79.9 81.8 1.9 81.6 90.0 864475On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 80.3, Target = 88.1CPI = 80.3, Target = 88.1 79.6 74.1 80.3 6.2 88.1 89.8 986675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------4--
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.5, Target = 94.8 91.0 86.6 91.5 4.9 94.8 95.5 8520475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 90.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 90.4, Target = 95.5 92.2 87.9 90.4 2.5 95.5 96.1 888975On Target
High needsCPI = 83.6, Target = 92.5CPI = 83.6, Target = 92.5CPI = 83.6, Target = 92.5 87.1 78.2 83.6 5.4 92.5 93.6 983875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  87.5---- 93.8-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.9CPI = 90.7, Target = 95.9 92.9 88.4 90.7 2.3 95.9 96.5 868175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.5 15.723625 1.4 3.82360
High needs 4.4 8.29825 3.3 9.2980
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 11.64325 2.4 7.0430
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 3.5 4.56625 5.3 13.6660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--4---4-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.7 16.120525 1.1 2.42050
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.7 31.823625 6.2 4.223625
High needs 10.1 18.29925 12.4 7.19925
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.8 22.74425 4.9 9.1440
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 8.9 12.16625 19.6 7.66625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--4---4-
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.1 34.820425 6.0 2.020425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 11.4 21.38925 2.9 4.5890
High needs 3.2 18.43825 6.5 10.5380
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.1 22.28125 3.4 3.7810
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 43.5 48.0 4.5 51.0Yes18775On Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 38.0 45.0 7.0 51.0Yes7575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 38.0 37.0 -1.0 51.0No3325Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 36.0 37.0 1.0 51.0Yes5375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-4--
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 44.0 48.0 4.0 51.0Yes16275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 48.0 56.0 8.0 51.0Yes18275On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 37.0 53.0 16.0 51.0Yes72100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 48.0 59.0 11.0 51.0Yes3175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 36.0 41.0 5.0 51.0No5150Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-4--
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 50.0 56.0 6.0 51.0Yes15875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 80.0 90.0---
High needs --- 80.0 90.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
White --- 80.0 90.0---
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All students --- 85.0 95.0---
High needs --- 85.0 95.0---
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.0---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
White --- 85.0 95.0---
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students236235100Yes237236100Yes8989100Yes
High needs989799Yes9999100Yes3838100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged434298Yes4444100Yes16---
EL and Former EL5---5---1---
Students w/ disabilities666598Yes6666100Yes2727100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.4---4---1---
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---1---
Hispanic/Latino5---6-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White205205100Yes205204100Yes8181100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles