Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frontier

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Frontier

District Information

District:

Frontier (06700000)

Region:

Pioneer Valley

Title I Status:

Yes

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.6	92.4	94.7	2.3	95.7	96.3	79	326	75	On Target
High needs		84.1	83.2	87.5	4.3	90.7	92.1	71	110	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		87.3	87.3	91.0	3.7	88.4	93.7	73	61	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		76.0	76.3	82.7	6.4	86.0	88.0	79	71	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.2	92.2	95.2	3.0	95.5	96.1	66	289	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		76.8	81.9	81.4	-0.5	86.5	88.4	55	326	25	No Change
High needs		63.4	65.6	65.7	0.1	78.7	81.7	38	108	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.3	71.3	70.8	-0.5	73.7	85.7	45	60	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		55.1	54.3	57.1	2.8	73.8	77.6	59	70	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		76.7	81.9	82.4	0.5	86.4	88.4	43	289	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		79.2	80.2	88.4	8.2	87.9	89.6	90	200	100	Above Target
High needs		72.5	69.6	78.2	8.6	84.0	86.3	85	62	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		68.5	68.5	83.3	14.8	71.1	84.3	91	30	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		72.3	63.3	72.1	8.8	83.8	86.2	85	43	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		80.2	80.5	88.1	7.6	88.5	90.1	78	177	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	25.3	21.8	326	0	2.8	2.1	326	25
High needs	14.2	7.3	110	0	8.0	6.4	110	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	23.0	13.1	61	0	8.2	6.6	61	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.6	1.4	71	0	11.7	8.5	71	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.2	22.5	289	0	2.9	1.7	289	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.4	35.9	326	25	11.7	12.9	326	0
High needs	12.5	13.9	108	25	27.7	31.5	108	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	19.7	21.7	60	25	21.3	28.3	60	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.6	5.7	70	25	40.8	41.4	70	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	26.3	37.4	289	25	12.1	11.4	289	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.2	19.0	200	25	10.7	3.5	200	25
High needs	5.7	9.7	62	25	20.0	9.7	62	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.1	16.7	30	25	26.2	3.3	30	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	2.2	4.7	43	25	26.7	14.0	43	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	12.4	20.3	177	25	10.2	4.0	177	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		46.0	54.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	301	75	On Target
High needs		47.0	51.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	95	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	59.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	50	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		42.0	53.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	63	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	56.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	269	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	52.0	4.0	51.0	No	300	75	On Target
High needs		47.0	45.0	-2.0	51.0	No	93	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		47.0	47.0	0.0	51.0	No	49	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		47.0	46.0	-1.0	51.0	Yes	62	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		47.0	53.0	6.0	51.0	No	268	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.9	92.8	0.9	80.0	90.0	97	75	On Target
High needs		79.4	86.1	6.7	80.0	90.0	36	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		93.1	91.3	-1.8	80.0	90.0	80	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.3	92.9	1.6	85.0	95.0	99	75	On Target
High needs		81.1	82.4	1.3	85.0	95.0	34	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	13	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		90.4	94.3	3.9	85.0	95.0	87	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.9	1.5	1.1	0.4	0.5	0.5	48	373	25	No Change
High needs		1.5	3.4	3.1	0.3	0.9	0.8	35	96	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		4.4	-	-	-	-	2.2	-	45	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		2.3	1.9	4.9	-3.0	1.3	1.2	24	61	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		1.0	1.4	0.9	0.5	0.6	0.5	44	331	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	329	327	99	Yes	329	327	99	Yes	210	208	99	Yes
High needs	111	111	100	Yes	111	109	98	Yes	69	67	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	62	62	100	Yes	62	61	98	Yes	35	34	97	Yes
EL and Former EL	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	71	71	100	Yes	71	70	99	Yes	47	46	98	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	16	-	-	-	16	-	-	-	11	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	291	289	99	Yes	291	289	99	Yes	185	183	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.