Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Athol High
District selectedDistricts School not selectedSchools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Athol High

District Information
District:Athol-Royalston (06150000)
Region:Central
Title I Status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.5, Target = 95.5 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 94.5, Target = 95.575 or Higher All Students 92.2 95.0 94.5 -0.5 95.5 96.1 188675On Target
High needsCPI = 89.4, Target = 92.3 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 89.4, Target = 92.3 75 or Higher High needs 86.8 91.7 89.4 -2.3 92.3 93.4 154525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90.5, Target = 92.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 90.5, Target = 92.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 91.9 91.9 90.5 -1.4 92.6 96.0 143725No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.8, Target = 95.7 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 95.8, Target = 95.775 or Higher White 92.6 95.1 95.8 0.7 95.7 96.3 107775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.6, Target = 89.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 82.6, Target = 89.6 75 or Higher All Students 82.1 79.5 82.6 3.1 89.6 91.1 178650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.9, Target = 86.5 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 73.9, Target = 86.5 75 or Higher High needs 76.8 68.8 73.9 5.1 86.5 88.4 174550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.7, Target = 73.7 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-CPI = 75.7, Target = 73.7CPI = 75.7, Target = 73.775 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 71.3 71.3 75.7 4.4 73.7 85.7 1537100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.8, Target = 89.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.8, Target = 89.8 75 or Higher White 82.5 80.9 83.8 2.9 89.8 91.3 67750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.3, Target = 92.8 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 80.3, Target = 92.8 75 or Higher All Students 87.7 81.4 80.3 -1.1 92.8 93.9 177625No Change
High needsCPI = 71.3, Target = 90 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 71.3, Target = 90 75 or Higher High needs 82.9 69.9 71.3 1.4 90.0 91.5 144050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 71.1, Target = 75.6 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 71.1, Target = 75.6 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 73.4 73.4 71.1 -2.3 75.6 86.7 163225No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.4, Target = 93.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 82.4, Target = 93.1 75 or Higher White 88.1 81.7 82.4 0.7 93.1 94.1 66850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.5 30.28625 2.4 2.3860
High needs 16.7 17.8450 4.2 4.4450
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.0 21.6370 5.0 5.4370
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.4 33.87725 2.4 1.37725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.0 30.2860 11.9 12.8860
High needs 14.6 20.04525 18.8 24.4450
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.5 24.33725 17.5 24.3370
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 32.1 33.8770 11.1 10.4770
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.9 11.8760 6.8 7.9760
High needs 10.3 2.5400 12.8 15.0400
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.5 3.1320 6.3 15.6320
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.5 13.2680 5.6 4.46825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 49.5, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 43.0 49.5 6.5 51.0No7450Below Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 49, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 41.5 49.0 7.5 51.0No3550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50, Target = 51 - Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged-SGP = 50, Target = 5175 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 39.5 50.0 10.5 51.0No2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 47.0 49.5 2.5 51.0No6850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher All Students 39.0 40.0 1.0 51.0Yes7475On Target
High needsSGP = 37, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 37, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 28.5 37.0 8.5 51.0Yes3575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 32, Target = 51 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged SGP = 32, Target = 51 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 38.0 32.0 -6.0 51.0Yes2975On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite SGP = 40, Target = 51 75 or Higher White 39.5 40.0 0.5 51.0Yes6875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 80.7, Target = 80 - All StudentsAll Students-Cohort Graduation Rate = 80.7, Target = 8075 or Higher All Students 70.7 80.7 10.0 80.0 90.08375On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 73.2, Target = 80 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs Cohort Graduation Rate = 73.2, Target = 80 75 or Higher High needs 60.6 73.2 12.6 80.0 90.05650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.025--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.02--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 82.1, Target = 80 - WhiteWhite-Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 82.1, Target = 8075 or Higher White 72.1 82.1 10.0 80.0 90.07875On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 75, Target = 85 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students Cohort Graduation Rate = 75, Target = 85 75 or Higher All Students 85.1 75.0 -10.1 85.0 95.0920Declined
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 66.7, Target = 85 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs Cohort Graduation Rate = 66.7, Target = 85 75 or Higher High needs 79.1 66.7 -12.4 85.0 95.0660Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.029--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.0---
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 75.6, Target = 85 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite Cohort Graduation Rate = 75.6, Target = 85 75 or Higher White 86.4 75.6 -10.8 85.0 95.0860Declined
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 5, Target = 3.6Dropout Rate 75 or Higher All Students 6.1 1.3 5.0 -3.7 3.6 3.1163800Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 8.2, Target = 4.7Dropout Rate 75 or Higher High needs 8.0 2.3 8.2 -5.9 4.7 4.0111950Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged  8.2---- 4.1-147--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------111--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 4.6, Target = 3.5Dropout Rate 75 or Higher White 6.0 1.4 4.6 -3.2 3.5 3.0113480Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students918998Yes918998Yes918998Yes
High needs494796Yes494796Yes494796Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged413995Yes413995Yes413995Yes
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities20---20---20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2---2---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino7---7---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White807999Yes807999Yes807999Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles